Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SatinDoll
Wong Kim Ark has zip-zero-nada to do with natural born citizen.

I stated that Ark ONLY declared him to be a citizen under the 14th Amendment - BUT that the dicta contained within it noted [NOT STATED] that English Common Law ALWAYS considered children born in England to aliens were natural-born. If you want me to quote the dicta, I can - but trust me, the reference is there.

Dicta DOESN'T mean squat in a legal ruling [although supporters of Obama would like to think so in Ark].

My point was that supporters of Obama INCORRECTLY state that NBC is settled law [from the Ark ruling] ...

I was just pointing that misconception out ...

BTW: I KNOW about the Justia thing ...

33 posted on 11/16/2011 10:43:16 PM PST by Lmo56 (If ya wanna run with the big dawgs - ya gotta learn to piss in the tall grass ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: Lmo56

You know squat!

It’s a holding, you fool, not dicta!
*********************************************************
The US Supreme Court in Ex Parte Lockwood, 154 U.S. 116 (1894) held:

“In Minor v. Happersett, 21 Wall. 162, this court held that the word ‘citizen’ is often used to convey the idea of membership in a nation, and, in that sense, women, if born of citizen parents within the jurisdiction of the United States, have always been considered citizens of the United States, as much so before the adoption of the fourteenth amendment of the constitution as since…”

Justice Horace Gray who wrote the opinion in Wong Kim Ark was on the Court for Lockwood. Minor continues to be cited as good law for 100 years on both the definition of federal citizenship under A2 S1, and voting rights, and it is beyond question controlling law. Minor was not decided under the 14th Amendment’s citizenship clause.

When the SCOTUS in Lockwood said…

“In Minor v. Happersett…this court held…”

it was a direct recognition of stare decisis on the federal citizenship issue.

The Court construed A2 S1 and determined that Minor, having been born of citizen parents within the US, was a citizen BEFORE the adoption of the 14th Amendment and further held that she did NOT derive her citizenship from that amendment.
**********************************************************
Leo Donofrio - naturalborncitizen: 1, November 14, 2011 at 10:42 pm. See:

http://jonathanturley.org/2011/10/23/holdings-dicta-and-stare-decisis/#comment-289930


34 posted on 11/16/2011 10:50:15 PM PST by SatinDoll (NO FOREIGN NATIONALS AS U.S.A. PRESIDENT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson