Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind

Hasn’t the Supreme Court already ruled in some case that lying, despicable as it might be, is still part of the “freedom of speech” thingy?


7 posted on 11/16/2011 3:04:22 PM PST by djf (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2801220/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: djf
the "freedom of speech" thingy

That is so 18th century.

12 posted on 11/16/2011 3:10:18 PM PST by all the best (`~!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: djf
Hasn’t the Supreme Court already ruled in some case that lying, despicable as it might be, is still part of the “freedom of speech” thingy?

Some federal courts have ruled the Stolen Valor Act unconstitutional on First Amendment grounds. The Supreme Court recently said it would take that issue. If it's argued this term, there should be a decision next Spring.

Historically it has not been illegal to lie. Civil damages for lying can only be awarded if the recipient relies on the lie to his financial detriment and his reliance was justified. Criminal penalties for lying generally only apply in cases of fraud with proof of intent to defraud.

What the Justice Department is proposing is just wrong.

35 posted on 11/16/2011 3:28:45 PM PST by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: djf

Nice catch!


46 posted on 11/16/2011 4:11:13 PM PST by rocksblues (Obama, the biggest liar in the history of American politics!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: djf

I like the idea that anyone with a law degree who lies any where at any time is guilty of perjury.


97 posted on 11/16/2011 7:12:45 PM PST by W. W. SMITH (Obama is an instrument of enslavement)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson