Posted on 11/16/2011 2:10:00 PM PST by Kid Shelleen
A new victim is claiming another member of the Penn State faculty sexually abused him years ago, and he said when he brought his abuse complaints to university officials, he was turned away. --snip-- Neisworth was later charged with multiple counts of child sexual abuse in Cecil County, Md., in 2005. However, McLaughlin claimed that at the time, Penn State officials said an indictment wasn't enough to investigate one of their faculty members.
(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...
But Rene Portland is gone. Go figger.
Penn State. They offer a Major in minors.
Pedo State University
Neisworth is a nationally acclaimed voice on child development and has been nationally recognized for his work with autistic children. He penned the book, "The Autism Encyclopedia."
(My bold) the logo would be a stiff, single penne. (pasta of course.) The mascot would be the same. Clever call--dead.
I agree. Time is the issue.
LOL!
The amount of children this man has hurt I am sure is astounding. Autistic children do not like being touched either. It is painful for them. I hope all these men get loads of prison time if you know what I mean.
Since we became civilized and politically correct, older men buggering young boys is not only approved. It is looked on by their supporters as a badge of honor, hell, the voters [I won’t insult people] of Mass. elected Barney Frank,probably with fullknowledge of his hobby the first and certainly by the second term,to Congress and return him every two years.
Very sad for the innocent students in addition to the abused. Those that play football there too are (whether they were or not) going to be looked at as if they were molested when they were not. What an embarrassing and shameful stain this leaves on all the students--graduated or not.
Sir (and to all),
As a poet, you would understand the use of...just the right word, yes?
You see, “pedophile” obscures the homosexual nature of this abomination.
I imagine PEDERAST is hard to rhyme and all, I do!...yet, is it not more...to the point?
Indeed good sir,
might I suggest a poem...perhaps for your wonderfully imagining heart, a poem that reveals the sick relief many
o so many!
will feel...
should a FEMALE victim be revealed?
Thank you kind sir,
for enduring,
my repetitive rant.
Your FRiend,
spank
Yeah, just like Duke down this region.
What?
Neisworth' status when complaints brought forth: Retired from Penn State
Sandusky's status when overwhelming bulk of complaints brought forth (all but the '98 couple of cases): Retired from Penn State (he was retired by June 1999)
Question #1: Why did you even mention "the prof is now retired" if that is NO DIFFERENT in most of the Sandusky charges?
Question #2: How is the retirement status -- which is the same for most of these cases -- something that "is very different from Sandusky's"???
Wanna make a retraction?
He complained in the 2000s about conduct that allegedly happened in the 1970s...
Let's get more specific (& more laser-like here):
"the 2000's" could be 2009 for all anybody knows reading your comments. But it was 2001 when he first confronted Neisworth and 2002 when he notified Penn State's admins.
"the 1970s" could be 1970-1971 for all anybody knows reading your comments. But it was "the late 1970s into the early 1980s"...so 1980...1981...and perhaps 1982, then?
There...what you on the surface presented that could be as far apart as 39 years...
...suddenly gets telescoped to its reality of perhaps only 19-20-21 years [complaint 2001; Penn State notification 2002; abuse as late 1981-1982]
Way to knock off a couple of decades in your lame attempt to say "this case is very different from Sandusky's.
When you look @ the Grand Jury presentment, it mentions "victim #7" (p. 20) meeting Sandusky in 1994. This victim says because he always moved away from Sandusky, the coach was never able to do more than put his hand on his thigh and down his waistpants (not at genital area). The presentment doesn't say what year this occurred...but if this occurred in 1994 and it came out in 2010 or 2011 that's a span of 16-17 years between the acts and the complaints.
Question #3: Tell us, 'Tanker...what's "very different" 'tween...
...a Sandusky complaint brought 16-17 years after the fact...
...vs. a Neisworth complaint brought 19-20-21 years after the fact?
Talk about inadvertently defending Penn State despite your claim "I'm not defending Penn State." You need to retract the whole ball of wax.
Where is the NCAA right NOW??? Their silence is deafening.
Sick...and yet so
They are the kNITkINseY LIONizerS...fans of when Kinsey was facilitating sexual child abuse of infants and toddlers and yet another Big 10 school...Indiana U...which few in our culture seem to care about.
Alas, Penn State was up to its old competitive ways...simply trying to outKinsey the Hoosiers, which was the original Perv State.
ALL: see
* How Alfred C. Kinseys Sex Studies Have Harmed Women and Children [Big 10 harbors perp culture]
* See also: The Children of Table 34 DVD
Penn State's athletic program and their admins utterly "flunked" their bar exam. They did not lionize honesty and responsibility, as NCAA bylaws specifically call for; instead some chose to "lionize" the spirit of Alfred Kinsey, who facilitated significant child sexual abuse via the Indiana Univ. studies. You'll note how Indiana Univ. officials have covered up the child sexual abuse in Kinsey's studies for over 50 years now! Hence, the Big 10 is the pedophile conference of the world!
But, on further review, I retract.
(Well, your pct. is probably better than most officials in NFL/NCAA :) )
They were running a boy molestion ring.
Madden thinks the Penn State pervs are being investigated for running a boy rape sex ring. There are probably more staff involved in abusing boys than just these two exposed so far.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.