Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: garybob
“Only in the case of in-bound nuclear missiles would that be impracticable, all other situations would allow some sort of staff meeting even if by video.”

You mean like Somalia 1993 where Clinton wasn't able to make a decision without discussing it with his staff first?

You're right, it was only our troops lives on the line waiting for Clinton and his staff to reach a decision. Nothing so important that couldn't wait right?

162 posted on 11/15/2011 3:41:03 PM PST by IMR 4350
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies ]


To: IMR 4350

You're right, it was only our troops lives on the line waiting for Clinton and his staff to reach a decision. Nothing so important that couldn't wait right?

Clinton was too arrogant and military loathing to give his commanders on the ground the authority to do what was necessary. Trying to run Somalia from Washington cost lives just as trying to run the Vietnam War cost lives. You're confusing possible scenarios for staff meetings. I learned long ago that if the commander needed to get a rifle and join in the firefight, things were really really bad.

Bottom line: you can't conceive of a cogent reason why a President would need to reach a decision without a staff meeting. No one has all the answers and anyone who tells you he does is either stupid or assumes that you are.

164 posted on 11/15/2011 5:43:46 PM PST by garybob (More sweat in training, less blood in combat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson