Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: IMR 4350

You're right, it was only our troops lives on the line waiting for Clinton and his staff to reach a decision. Nothing so important that couldn't wait right?

Clinton was too arrogant and military loathing to give his commanders on the ground the authority to do what was necessary. Trying to run Somalia from Washington cost lives just as trying to run the Vietnam War cost lives. You're confusing possible scenarios for staff meetings. I learned long ago that if the commander needed to get a rifle and join in the firefight, things were really really bad.

Bottom line: you can't conceive of a cogent reason why a President would need to reach a decision without a staff meeting. No one has all the answers and anyone who tells you he does is either stupid or assumes that you are.

164 posted on 11/15/2011 5:43:46 PM PST by garybob (More sweat in training, less blood in combat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies ]


To: garybob
If you want a president that can't make a decision without input from his staff, go for it.

Me, I don't.

I prefer a president that can make a snap decision when and if the situation arises.

166 posted on 11/15/2011 6:23:43 PM PST by IMR 4350
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson