[MHGinTN]

When/if you read the Grand Jury presentments, more than one victim has claimed behavior by Sandusky common to the incidents when the child tried to shower further away from Snadusky. These victims also testified that Sandusky committed sexual assault on them. Now, some of the same people who are touting the veracity of Herman Cain's accusers are pleading we should not believe the children Sandusky victimized. Something really smells rancid with a few of these posters trying to dissemble what is in the Grand Jury Presentments.

One further note: Sanduskuy is the only legitimate source for the names of those he victimized, since the names have been sealed by the court, so the sleazy lawyer who had NBC's help tonight issued a threat that other victims could be 'outed' soon. NBC is as low on the gutter scale as any traiters to American could be. But those trying to defend this sexual predator and his sleazy lawyer are pushing for vermin status.

[Realness]

The hypocrisy of people believing Herman’s accusers and defending Sandusky is no different from those doubting his accusers and assuming Sandusky’s guilt.

Same bullshit, different angle.

[FredZarguna]

We might make the analogy that Mike Nifong also had a Grand Jury, and many of the FReepers who refused to believe that indictment are all too willing to claim every word in the current document is Gospel.

As for the vermin crap, if everyone who won't join your lynch mob is vermin, then, yeah, I'm vermin. This is not evidence. This is an accusation. That's all. No evidence has been heard by any trier of fact in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

[Williams]

All I said was it appears the 100 reports I heard stating Sandusky “admitted” to raping a boy in a shower, were inaccurate. Seemed unlikely but heard it again and again.

I’m best guessing he is guilty, but I always caution against believing tv reports are reality.

As in McMartin School and other cases.