Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SoKatt

You must mean Paterno. He did do something. He reported it. To whom would be the person(s) to also go after because Sandusky should have been charged at that time.

The school’s administrators, Sandusky and Paterno should all be in court, IMO


43 posted on 11/12/2011 6:50:22 AM PST by TribalPrincess2U (WE ARE AMERICA! DONATE TO FR MORE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: TribalPrincess2U

I agree.


76 posted on 11/12/2011 7:18:39 AM PST by SoKatt ("Change" is not a strategy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

To: TribalPrincess2U

Paterno reported the hearsay evidence to Athletic Director Curley and Finance Director Schultz (who was also the supervisor of the University Police). After that Paterno was no longer invited to meetings. It was Schultz who decided it not be reported to the police. McQuery, who actually witnessed the activity, also did nothing to stop it nor did he go to the police. He was in on the meetings with Curley, Schultz, and possibly Spanier.

Should JoePa have done more? Absolutely. But he did report it to the University Police supervisor.

There’s several question I have been asking and no one in the media is asking: Who granted Sandusky emeritus status after he retired in 1998? Did Spanier and the Trustees have to approve it? That gave him the keys to the kingdom (ie locker room).


89 posted on 11/12/2011 7:32:36 AM PST by OrioleFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson