All the do-gooders said that this was homophobic and deeply wrong.
But I think the Boy Scouts were on to something.
In these short few days this thing has been analyzed by every news outlet in every which way - except the glaring fact that it was homosexual pedophilia. No one dares say the “H” word.
Sandusky was married, so how would that have kept him out of the Boy Scouts?
All the do-gooders said that this was homophobic and deeply wrong.
But I think the Boy Scouts were on to something.
Do some online research into it and you will find that in the US, homosexuals have shunned NAMBLA because a link would stop advancing their agenda for gay marriage, etc.
Look in Europe and you will see that homosexuals have advocated (and succeeded) in lowering the age of consent to the age of 14.
They are very careful to package their wishes in the US, so you will see homosexuals condemn Sandusky very loudly to preserve their legal gains.
I agree with the Boy Scouts but these perverts know how to live just the right way to get accepted...married...church going..laughing...smiling...friendly....”really” really likes kids....
Clear Case, Boy Scout leaders need to take training, are never, ever allowed to be one-on-one with a kid and have an annual background check.
There are specific reporting requirements that go directly to the top of council leadership then immediately to the authorities.
The training is also public and available online. It’s called Youth Protection and is available for other organizations to use at no cost.
In fact, I think mine is expiring soon and I need to retake it.