To: SeekAndFind
He does more than ignore. As an official representative of the US Government, he has gone to Iran’s state media on several occasions knocking the US and her allies. It seems interventionism is fine if it is against us or our allies.
2 posted on
11/11/2011 6:37:01 AM PST by
mnehring
To: SeekAndFind
Hey it’s hard to see danger with fake eyebrows clouding your vision.
3 posted on
11/11/2011 6:38:48 AM PST by
rawcatslyentist
(It is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; ~Vattel's Law of Nations)
To: SeekAndFind
He doesn’t seem to understand that Iran doesn’t want a nuke to use as a threat. Iran wants a nuke to use.
4 posted on
11/11/2011 6:50:00 AM PST by
cripplecreek
(A vote for Amnesty is a vote for a permanent Democrat majority. ..Choose well.)
To: SeekAndFind
I think Paul goes too far in ignoring the wild qualities of the Iranian regime. But backward Iran is no threat to the USA. If it really was a threat we would have never been so adamant in removing Saddam Hussein, the natural counterweight and obstacle to Iran.
To: SeekAndFind
Ron Paul 1488
The Final Solution for America
The two eights of the number 1488 stand for the eigth letter of the alphabet: H. And the two of them together form H H or Heil Hitler.
The fourteen part of the number 1488 stands for those fourteen words that every white supremacist knows: "We must secure the existence of our people and a future for White children. (hat tip Bill Levinson)
12 posted on
11/11/2011 8:15:28 AM PST by
Stepan12
To: SeekAndFind
There’s a quote circulating around the internet that says it all about Ron Paul’s foreign policy “expertise”:
You’re all familiar with the broken clock that is right twice a day. Ron Paul is like a strange broken clock that is right 23 hours a day. Then you get to some foreign policy midnight, and instead of chiming, it barks and smears itself with poo.”
15 posted on
11/11/2011 9:15:53 AM PST by
Ancesthntr
(Bibi to Odumbo: Its not going to happen.)
To: SeekAndFind
Perhaps he just has the fear that attacking Iran might lead to WWIII. Which it could.
That said, I personally don't care for his foreign policy.
20 posted on
11/11/2011 12:44:08 PM PST by
wolfcreek
(Perry to Obama: Adios, MOFO!)
To: SeekAndFind
To: SeekAndFind
I'm not sure what the real difference is between:
Ron Paul, who says we should do nothing about Iran's nuke program, and as President would do nothing:
and George W. Bush, who talked and talked and talked and talked and talked and talked and talked and talked and talked and talked and talked and talked and talked and talked and talked about the Iranian threat for eight years, and did nothing.
23 posted on
11/11/2011 1:17:05 PM PST by
Notary Sojac
(I wish someone would tell me what "ditty wah ditty" means.)
To: SeekAndFind; firebrand; SunkenCiv; Clintonfatigued; Just A Nobody; fieldmarshaldj; ...
Ron Paul: great on domestic policy, awful on foreign policy. That may sound very simple, but it's pretty darn accurate.
To: SeekAndFind
I would suggest that you all read Big Oil & Their Bankers In The Persian Gulf: Four Horsemen, Eight Families & Their Global Intelligence, Narcotics & Terror Network Dean Henderson. This book will open your eyes of have big oil has dominated our foreign policy for the last 60 years.
30 posted on
11/11/2011 4:52:50 PM PST by
guitarplayer1953
(Rebellion to Tyrants is Obedience to GOD! Thomas Jefferson)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson