Skip to comments.
Ron Paul Ignores Iran's Treachery (GOP presidential candidate demonstrates appalling ignorance)
American Thinker ^
| 11/11/2011
| Reza Kahlili
Posted on 11/11/2011 6:32:01 AM PST by SeekAndFind
Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul is demonstrating an appalling ignorance on the Iranian nuclear issue and the threat it poses to world security. In fact, several times during the recent GOP debates he blamed the animosity against the U.S. in the Middle East on America's foreign policy.
Paul recently argued on "Fox News Sunday" that sanctions should be removed altogether to get Iran to act differently and that the U.S. response to Iran's nuclear pursuit was an "overreaction." He added that Iran does not pose a threat to either the U.S. or the region. The congressman from Texas insists that a better art of persuasion would be to offer friendship, the way the U.S. approached the Soviets and Chinese in the 1970s and 1980s.
So Paul not only has shown that he has no understanding of the murderous radicals who rule Iran but has a dangerous lapse of memory. President Obama at first tried to do exactly what Paul argues now should be done -- and failed miserably.
When Obama took office in 2009, he immediately changed the U.S. approach toward Iran, believing that the mullahs would only change behavior if a kinder, gentler approach were implemented. His appeasement of the mullahs started when he sent his video message on the occasion of the Iranian New Year in 2009, stating his desire for friendship with the Iranian leaders. That was followed by a letter to the Iranian supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, in which he reiterated that America did not intend to interfere in Iran's internal matters and that it respected the sovereignty of the Islamic state and that he desired better relations between the two countries.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: axisofbuffoonery; axisofevil; axisofstupidity; axisofweasels; balloons; bombbombbombbombiran; clowns; iran; israel; nazis; pipeorgan; ronpaul; ronpaultruthfile; waronterror
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-39 last
To: cripplecreek
Just like nazi germany. after all it was "only" Jews they want to kill.
The surrender monkey is the Nevile Chamberlain of the 21st century. Cut and run thinks that if we appease our enemies enough they will leave us alone. It did not work in the 20th century, and it will not work now.
21
posted on
11/11/2011 12:59:05 PM PST
by
John D
To: SeekAndFind
To: SeekAndFind
I'm not sure what the real difference is between:
Ron Paul, who says we should do nothing about Iran's nuke program, and as President would do nothing:
and George W. Bush, who talked and talked and talked and talked and talked and talked and talked and talked and talked and talked and talked and talked and talked and talked and talked about the Iranian threat for eight years, and did nothing.
23
posted on
11/11/2011 1:17:05 PM PST
by
Notary Sojac
(I wish someone would tell me what "ditty wah ditty" means.)
To: therightliveswithus
Ron Paul is nuts
That would explain why he left the medical practice for a career in congress. However, there is a lot more money to be made in congress, so maybe he's crazy like a fox.
24
posted on
11/11/2011 1:21:59 PM PST
by
crosshairs
(Liberalism is to truth, what east is to west.)
To: Stepan12
Ron Paul 1488 The Final Solution for America The two eights of the number 1488 stand for the eigth letter of the alphabet: H. And the two of them together form H H or Heil Hitler. The fourteen part of the number 1488 stands for those fourteen words that every white supremacist knows: "We must secure the existence of our people and a future for White children. (hat tip Bill Levinson) What the hell is that supposed to mean?
25
posted on
11/11/2011 2:15:31 PM PST
by
jmc813
To: MediaMole
This may be as alarming as implied, but I have tapped my own nuclear information resources to assess possibilities here.
26
posted on
11/11/2011 2:53:28 PM PST
by
Paul Ross
(Ronald Reagan-1987:"We are always willing to be trade partners but never trade patsies.")
To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...
27
posted on
11/11/2011 2:59:38 PM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(It's never a bad time to FReep this link -- https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: SeekAndFind; firebrand; SunkenCiv; Clintonfatigued; Just A Nobody; fieldmarshaldj; ...
Ron Paul: great on domestic policy, awful on foreign policy. That may sound very simple, but it's pretty darn accurate.
Comment #29 Removed by Moderator
To: SeekAndFind
I would suggest that you all read Big Oil & Their Bankers In The Persian Gulf: Four Horsemen, Eight Families & Their Global Intelligence, Narcotics & Terror Network Dean Henderson. This book will open your eyes of have big oil has dominated our foreign policy for the last 60 years.
30
posted on
11/11/2011 4:52:50 PM PST
by
guitarplayer1953
(Rebellion to Tyrants is Obedience to GOD! Thomas Jefferson)
To: Colonel Kangaroo
An Iran without nuclear weapons is a pain. An Iran with nukes is a threat.
31
posted on
11/11/2011 7:35:34 PM PST
by
rmlew
("Mosques are our barracks, minarets our bayonets, domes our helmets, the believers our soldiers.")
32
posted on
11/11/2011 7:59:01 PM PST
by
RedMDer
(Forward With Confidence!)
To: Colonel Kangaroo
The fact that they have orbited satellites not with standing of course...
33
posted on
11/12/2011 5:37:14 AM PST
by
ejonesie22
(8/30/10, the day Truth won.)
To: cripplecreek
“I don’t know why so many have trouble grasping just how insane these twelvers really are.”
Yes, but such a failure can be extraordinarily convenient if you want to believe that you can avoid confronting those twelvers. If your position is that Iran can be ‘deterred’, then admitting that they are religious extremists who believe their mission is to wash the world in blood and usher in the rule of the 12th Iman is rather inconvenient.
To: justiceseeker93
It’s a shame. If only he was passible instead of Kucinichian.
35
posted on
11/13/2011 5:21:45 AM PST
by
Impy
(Don't call me red.)
To: Stepan12
"The two eights of the number.."Your post is just bizarre.
The "Truthers" hold not particular advantage over your ability to invent.
36
posted on
11/13/2011 7:08:46 AM PST
by
Designer
(Nit-pickin' and chagrinin')
To: RockinRight
Despite their subjugation by Islam the Iranians have resisted arabization. They are Persians proud of their ancient heritage and have only well-deserved contempt for the sand rat ragheads. That they have been taken over and ruled by these arab-inspired primitive religious savages is a shame.
Nevertheless they are under the control of a police state pure and simple, a state which can and might do anything conceivable. Paul's blindness to this simple reality is inexplicable.
To: Notary Sojac
The difference is that Bush is not running anymore. Otherwise your point is right on.
To: Colonel Kangaroo; All
This is the same type of attitude we had before WWII. We never thought that Japan will never hit us. Well they did.
Never never underestimate the bad guys......
39
posted on
11/13/2011 9:20:55 AM PST
by
KevinDavis
(Birthers are ignorant about the Constitution.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-39 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson