As I posted upthread (you go find it, I won't do your work for you), knowing what was in the complaints is separate, and can't be compared to, from knowing what the details of the agreements were. Get that in your head. He was already gone from the NRA when the settlements were made. Now you've been told (again). Another disingenuous claim by you on this and we'll know you're agenda driven and not interested in the truth.
He didn’t sign the final agreements because his attorneys signed. These were not suits but employment complaints handled by the company and its attorneys. But his attorneys were in there representing him and working it out, so unless he is completely irresponsible and inattentive, he must have known something about what was going on. Certainly, he knew that they existed, and he even denied this when the story first broke.
We’re getting down to parsing what the meaning of “is” is, and that’s exactly the point that Mona Charen was making, I think.