Fifth Cain woman says she’s not an ‘accuser’

Donna Donella, one of the five women caught up in the charges of sexual harassment being leveled against Herman Cain, said Wednesday she is not an “accuser.”

“I take issue with being labeled in the media as 'Accuser No. 5,' ” she said in an interview with The Washington Times-affiliated “America's Morning News” radio program. “I want to make it very clear that Herman Cain never sexually harassed me, I’ve never accused Herman Cain of sexually harassing me. The only reason that I came forward is because I saw behavior, the one day that I met him … that was consistent with the pattern of his behavior described by his four actual accusers.”

“I can’t put a finger on it, but as most women will tell you, you kind of have a sense when men are on the up and up and when there are men who may not be. I had that feeling and so did my colleague, and that’s why she jumped in and said, ‘Oh, let’s all go to dinner.’ “

tjd1454 said: "I sincerely hope the charges are, as you put it, a devious attack."

I can't even describe how it makes me FEEL to consider the attacks against Cain while considering the history of Teddy Kennedy. There is something so very wrong with the situation.

I can only repeat my advice to cut off all support to the liberal media. Stop subscribing to your local liberal rag. Tune out completely the broadcast networks. If you don't do this, then you are paying the salaries of those who are trying to destroy us.

Let’s not forget no one has validated the statement regarding 2 bottles of expensive wine.

Yeah. A couple of European Professional 'Escorts' got stuck with the booze tab on their expense account, and failed to get something they could 'blackmail' the client with.

They weren't about to let that audience 'floozy' needle in on their client.

The funny part might be that they offered Herman a 2 for 1 deal, and he still refused.

In the incident where, after a speech, Herman goes to dinner and invites a female from the audience who proposed an excellent question for discussion, I question why this was even considered to be 'devious'?

Is this not the norm, anyway? That the guest speaker may invite audience members to dinner, or someone from the press?

Don't expect me to also believe that a GUEST SPEAKER of the NRA goes to dinner, and will have any kind of privacy at the table, such as one might if you were an unknown visiting businessman.

I don't know if there is any truth to the alleged incident, but I would find it inappropriate for a speaker to single out a woman in the audience and tried to get someone to set up a dinner together. This was not a "Hey let's all go out to dinner - and maybe that young lady in the audience would like to join us...

Frankly IMHO even that would be a stretch.

There often is time after a meeting concludes for interested persons to come up and talk further with the speaker. I frankly find it incredible that a speaker would be so impressed with the brilliance of a question that they made it a point to try to have someone seek out that person (who happens to be of the opposite sex) to invite them to dinner.

We must not allow our support for any candidate cause us to deny what we know to be right and wrong.

I went to college down South.

Mr. Cain is an old time Southern gentleman. The kind of man who would take off his hat if a lady entered an elevator.

You're the kind of “lady” who would call such manners, “Unwanted near-adulterous flirtation.”

BTW: You exhibit no inkling of what is really going on in this matter. You really think that “something” happened.

If “something” happened, then it is up to your brave females to take lie detector tests and prove to all the world that they aren't liars.

I'll bet you a thousand dollars that they are liars. Wanna bet?

You see, you think that the accused must be “guilty” of “something” otherwise why would the accuser, especially if a woman, make the accusation?

Ever hear of Saul Alinsky? Ever hear of Comrade Trotsky, David Axelrod’s great great grandfather? Ever hear of Bill Daley and David Axelrod flying to California & gaining access to sealed court records regarding candidate Ryan's divorce? Ever wonder why Alan Keyes had to jump into the Senatorial race when Ryan was hit with “secret,” “hidden,”
“sealed,” court records?

Ever wonder why Ms. Bialek (”Bye-A-Lick”) lives in the same apartment building on Lake Shore Drive as Trotsky's heir to the Revolution? Ever read, “Darkness At Noon?” Ever wonder when looking at Gloria AllRed that the Salem Witch Trials may have had some point? After all, AllRed sent Bialek to national t.v. to declare that Mr. Cain must be a certified psychopathic liar and thus can beat a lie detector test; therefore, you, according to your own logic, believe this.

It would never occur to you that Witch AllRed put her corrupt client up there to preempt a successful test by their target. BTW: What are Bialek’s credentials regarding her last calumnious accusation?

No, you've never wondered about any of this because you want to believe that the seriousness of the accusation is more important than its truth or falsity. You, Madam, are the problem, sitting before t.v. screens by the millions, clueless.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.