Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Colofornian

Look, my son is a victim of a pedophile. I would like to meet Sandusky in a dark alley for about 30 seconds. I would also ask that we wait until the trial to roast Paterno.

Discovery should be riveting.If the findings are that Joe is culpable then fry his butt.We do live in a society that we have to be proven guilty. Paterno is already toast.


343 posted on 11/09/2011 2:06:42 PM PST by halfright ("Peace is that brief glorious moment in history when everybody stands around reloading". --Thomas Je)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 291 | View Replies ]


To: halfright
Discovery should be riveting If the findings are that Joe is culpable then fry his butt.We do live in a society that we have to be proven guilty. Paterno is already toast.

We've already "discovered" that Paterno is not worthy of coaching again...well, he thinks for another year...I & many other would say another game...

So, now that Paterno is beginning to come to "terms" of the situation, all the Board of Trustees has to sort out is the quibbles: Tomorrow, Thursday, or the end of the season?

I've haven't pushed to get JoePa behind bars. I've pushed for campus-wide accountability. As in MANY losing their jobs. NOW.

And since Joe lives on campus, that includes being summarily kicked off campus since taxpayers are funding it.

Joe, after all, already has another "job" waiting for him: A full-time one, IMA. He'll be depositioned day after day in civil trial after civil trial.

Nice "retirement plan."

349 posted on 11/09/2011 2:32:27 PM PST by Colofornian (The Ped State KNitKinsey Lionizers: The campus which most now love to loathe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 343 | View Replies ]

To: halfright
"If the findings are that Joe is culpable then fry his butt.We do live in a society that we have to be proven guilty."

Our legal system requires proof of guilt. Our society (at least the moral parts of it) allow for judgment based on personal conviction. I would not allow somebody I knew, or merely suspected was a chronic drinker or drug user to look after my house or my dog, even though they had never been convicted of possession, DUI, public intoxication, etc.

Keep in mind, Sandusky hasn't yet been convicted of anything. Would you allow him to watch your kids, or have you already formed a judgment?

351 posted on 11/09/2011 2:38:38 PM PST by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 343 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson