Good questions. He was treated with kid gloves unless he was asked any of these questions.
But that aside, why would he be willing to kill the entire GOP for his ego? He’s obviously done something out of line, or he wouldn’t have had two employment claims against him (no, not every boss even in the 1990s had this). He needs to address this matter, which he has constantly managed to avoid doing.
But in his mind it’s all about him. I think it’s all about getting a conservative candidate with smarts. He’s clearly not the one.
You have proof? Please share..
Yeah, for liberals and RINOs, it’s not the nature of the evidence (real or fake) that is relevant. It’s the seriousness of the charge.
He’s obviously done something out of line, or he wouldn’t have had two employment claims against him.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
that’s not true.
as explained on various news shows many times, corporations find it cheaper to make financial agreements and settlements
in order to avoid legal fees.
Cain was told the claim against NRAss had no merit. I fail to see how Cain is involved in the separate claim at NRAss Foundation ~ an organization overwhich he appears to have had no authority.
You'll have to come up with something or you will make a lot of unfriends here who ask that you be DELETED.
That’s racist!
Whoa! At least one of them was a termination, not a settlement. Which tends to establish that the sexual harrassment claim was baseless. And evidently, this is the lady who was offended by the hand gesture and "You're the same height as my wife." Which, wouldn't you agree, is baseless? We don't yet know any details regarding the other.
Plus, I would submit that any man who headed a 300-person office during the nineties probably faced at least one accusation of sexual harrassment during his career.
Its not about him.
We’ve been treated to malicious gossip.
There is no proof any of the alleged incidents happened. The media’s interest in his sex life has pushed aside the issues the campaign wants to discuss.
Quite frankly, the assault on the character of a decent man is reprehensible. And again, no one should be asked to prove a negative.
Then there’s the statute of limitations. The most recent allegation goes back ten years and the oldest something like 15 years ago.
How on God’s green earth that is relevant to Cain’s fitness to be President today, I don’t know. And quite frankly, I don’t care about them because they appeal to the worst of human nature.
I won’t disparage Mr Cain, but the longer this drags out, the longer it distracts from the real issues and our entire field.
A lawyer quite familiar with such cases says settlements in those amounts were relatively small which is associated with nuisance cases. So I totally reject your take on it.
Just comparing apples and oranges. ..
A nearby county just settled a sex abuse/harassment case against their sheriff. 15 former inmates got $13.5 million. This is in the heart of hardtimes, Oklahoma.
Cain’s “victims” seem to have settled awfully cheap.
Agreed, but stand by for incoming...
There seems to be a different set of rules for when Clinton had bimbo eruptions (not acceptable on FR) and when Cain does (acceptable, obviously the women are all wh*res). More and more, Cain seems to be a combination of Obama and Clinton—he’s not shy about pulling the race card against a fellow Republican, and he seems to have “women problems.” Plus, he can’t seem to get his stories straight.
What a bunch of hooey.
Every accuser thus far has motives or blemishes to discredit them.
Think about it...he's a staunch conservative working for a DC political lobby. What are the odds that the organization is going to have a lot of hateful liberals in it who are going to hate Cain because of his conservatism?
If Cain is not the conservative man with smarts, who might be the one?
If Cain is not the conservative man with smarts, who might be the one?
Stop it. You’re showing a tendency to be objective.