Posted on 11/08/2011 1:41:09 PM PST by NormsRevenge
Sharon Bialek is learning firsthand why the other three women who have accused Herman Cain of sexual harassment may have resisted going fully public with their claims.
The Chicago-area woman, whose name and face was broadcast all over American television Monday as she described being groped 14 years ago by the Republican presidential hopeful, has a past. And after making herself the first and as of yet, the only accuser whose name has been made public, that past is being dug up.
Who is Sharon Bialek? is the subject line of the latest email from Cains presidential campaign, which has struggled for the last week to deliver a consistent and convincing response to the harassment allegations.
As Ms. Sharon Bialek has placed herself in the public spotlight through making patently false allegations against Herman Cain, it is only fair to compare her track record alongside Mr. Cains, the email says.
The email lists six court cases in which Bialeks name appears as a defendant, and states that Bialek filed for bankruptcy in 1991 and 2001. It also cites TV news reports that Bialek was sued over a paternity matter in 1999 and that she has worked for nine employers over the last 17 years.
The questions should be who is financing her legal team, have any media agreed to pay for her story, and has she been offered employment for taking these actions? the email concludes.
Cain campaign spokesman J.D. Gordon defended the tactic.
(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...
Hey, what about this....She was out of a job in ‘97 living in Chicago and get’s Cain on the phone. Why the NEED to travel to him for a cup of coffee - when she could have very easily asked him on that same phone call about her needing a job? Lots of money spent to ask someone for a job - no wonder he asked ‘what are you here for’? The money and time spent arranging the details to get to DC - just to ask for something that could have been asked on the phone? Riiight!! - what was her boyfriend suggesting - climb the ladder however you can? And it didn’t work - so she figured she’d polish it up NOW to make it work somehow as she is out of work, again. Her intentions weren’t pure back then and they aren’t pure now, IMO.
I just noticed she’s wearing false eyelashes. Why would she do that? This is not a bright woman.
Warren Harding?
“multiple Flags behind the Podium”
That’s nice to see. We sure don’t get any American flags with Obama.
Grover Cleveland. :)
'She's a complete gold digger': Murky past of Herman Cain accuser starts to emerge
Witness: Cain accuser hugged him during Tea Party meeting a month ago [Sharon Bialek]
Sharon Bialeks Fiance Backs Her 100 Percent (FIANCE HEARD ABOUT IT ONLY ON FRIDAY! Wolf! Wolf!)
MSNBC Slams Cain Accuser:This Woman...Is Very Interested In The Limelight (Not Satire)
Sharon Bialek Evades Question Of Whether Shed Previously Called Lawyers Of Other Cain Accusers
Cain Camp Questions Bialeks Background (More of Sharon Bialek's litigous past emerges)
Who is Cain accuser Sharon Bialek?
Cain Accuser Sharon Bialek Lived In Same Building As David Axelrod
Witness: Cain accuser hugged him during Tea Party meeting a month ago [Sharon Bialek]
Cain accuser has history of financial troubles, legal squabbles
Lin Wood Legal Counsel up first..
Lin Wood is a good attorney.
I think Jennifer could hit a key or two if pressed.. not sure this one has it in in her.
Lin Wood looks good, sounds good, and makes a f* of a lot of COMMON SENSE.
Memory vague—didn’t he represent the Ramseys?
questioning the motive.. good move..
He looks good in front of the flags. :)
Doubtless many are advising Herman Cain to hold back, but it looks like this has only lit his fuse. We shall see!
Take your message directly to the people, Herman!
I hadn’t given it a thought before, perhaps I just assumed Allred was working for the usual third contingency that lawyers get.
But-—But-—You are right.
There is no money involved here. This woman came out of nowhere and she is not suing anyone.
She is probably not so rich that she can just hire Allred to Represent her, in a case with no money involved that she could have just as well stayed out of.
Although I am sure Allred is getting paid, I believe she is a big enough news-whore that perhaps she would perhaps,work for nothing.
There are many people who would probably pay her. If we speculate we are being unfair, but lets do it anyway. SEIU, Soros, AFL/CIO, Romney,Obama,even NOW., Any one of them could bve paying Allred. It would be fun to know.
Just physically. I saw Genifer in New Orleans, and aside from her bad piano player, it was a pretty good act.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.