The BEST analysis is a "skeptical" analysis of the new aggregate data set, and it agrees pretty closely with previous findings.
IMO, it's very unlikely that additional analysis is going to much alter that finding.
Aggregated from the same data set. They just applied additional filters to the same data set. If does not show significant cooling from the 60's to the 70's, which is impossible. Any accurate data set must show that cooling because the world knows it happened. Later.
And that’s where you’re wrong. Even Curry is not a skeptic and she took What’s-his-face to task.