Where did I say she shouldn’t be held accountable for what she said? I was just making a comment in regards to how I feel about it personally. Amy really is a good person, with a good heart - despite whatever mistakes she’s made in the past.
We’re not talking about HER being the one who accused Cain... I think what she talked about in regards to the encounter she witnessed at TeaCon WAS important. I just don’t agree with Amy’s opinion as to this woman being credible, and I think she should have kept that part to herself, IMO.
Sorry, but like I said it’s not like Amy is some random person to me, and I do care what happens to her. That I hope she doesn’t find herself in a heap of trouble in this mess doesn’t mean that I don’t think she should be held accountable for her words or actions.
“and I do care what happens to her.”
So what?,,i’m sure Cain is important to his loved ones and they care what happens to him too. Look up “gonzo journalism” on the google. It’s where the reporter is PART of the story.
She involved herself by vouching for the credibility of a non credible person,,, so she should suffer full scrutiny. What is the personal angle for her? Fame, money, politics, access to a single guy and a pool? We may never know,, so we judge brutally by accuracy.
And as an information consumer,, how do i know this isn’t another “error in judgement”?
She deserves every bit of the suspicion as to actions and motives as Cain is enduring. Thats where sympathy should properly lie. She jumped on the Bialek snowball with no proof,, so she’s either reckless or malicious. In either case,, she should face the blowtorch. It’s a Dan Rather thing.