Replies

Agree that was left out of the WashingtonPo by the attorney in the first round--however Cain did admit that it was an issue that had to be delt with whether innocent or "misunderstood" regarding intent. The other case of the Iowans was bogus [and took the time to watch the talk host the next day play it safe in regard to Cain, but still Cain was part of his dialog], which I might add a cohort by the name of Woodie made a comment on an associate of the Christian talk show host not being there that day [for whatever reason adds another question] and he had come specifically to see her--which could have been deemed more inappropriate humor by most in comparison to what had been rumored in the Iowan case by this talk show host and Politico [wonder if Rush knows Politico is running ads in "the break"]

This last case which could bring Cain down even if false with all the attention and donor money he has to use in fighting these allegations in the media and at events keeps him away from the important issues of the day--who will donate if the money has to go into the campaign budget to fight allegations and not promote his tax plan.

Do you know the name of the friend who contacted the latest accuser represented by Ms Allred? The accuser herself said she lives in the same building in Chicago as Axelrod, she said was a small building [?] and everyone knows each other--what must be the rents, fees to live in that building--how do you afford that with past poor financials? Axelrod has means. And who does her bf of over a decade know in Chicago politics if anyone--that would search her out if what she says is true[people lie to attorneys too, Allred is a useful tool]. She had to mention the Tea Party. Fox reported she said she hugged Cain and wondered if he remembered her. [Sounds like a Lewinsky inspired moment to set the stage].

I like Cain, don't get me wrong and he was/ still is first on my list so far.

Perhaps this has been staged for a while now and certain events put in place [people of interest, no names] to see how it all plays out. Gone Fishing! Either way the intent would be the public would tire of politics as usual and move on to another candidate easier for Obama to come up against.

Am saying it was handled poorly at the onset of allegations. Cain's remembering removing himself from the matter--it was a very uncomfortable reply by Cain and his handlers. The general public, the lowly worker, think of money paid out as an admittance of wrong doing--which we know is not always the case; even though Michael Jackson was considered guilty for doing so.

I have some corporate understanding of how HR works and matters like this. But no one forgets ! such allegations and goes off just whistling a happy tune even if found innocent as Cain said he was. It is an attack on one's integrity which would be important to a strong leader like Cain.

Those questions above were not asked of Allred's client by Martha in the latest Fox interview..why was that? I would be interested.