So the $100K View circuit has no bearing on her story.
Pray for America
In 1999, Bialek’s son Nicholas was born and a paternity lawsuit was filed by the father, a media executive. This is more than a year after the alleged incident and 5-6 years into her marriage.
I seem to remember allegations made against Obama too, however, the media ignored them. Why didn’t that man’s allegations make national news?
Wow... not the most stable gal on the block and she has loads of money problems!
Yup, she has a beef with Herman Cain alright. She’s broke.
So of course she voted against Clinton and Gore. /sarc
Put some ice on it.
This reads like a poorly written 2 part story line in the old TV series ‘IN THE HEAT OF THE NIGHT.’
Can someone please tell Gloria the Red that Precious was not employed at the time? Cain could not have been her boss, and could not be guilty of workplace sexual harassment.
Can anyone open this link?
This is supposedly what is there about her:
Sued for $440.00 1994
Sued for $2205.00 2000 BROADACRE MANAGEME Joint Lawsuit
Sued for $2250.00 “ “
Sued for $6750.00 “ “
Sued for $3000.00 Mark Beatovic 2005
Sued for $1000.27 MIDLAND FUNDING LL
2007
Sued for $3539.58 ILLINOS LENDING
2009
Just another scumbag from the Allred Rent An Accuser stable. Creepy women. A “Chicago-area woman”, huh? Damn. Chicago-area. Chicago-area. Where have I heard that before?
Be advised the political landscape is littered with the corpses of Allreds victories over republicans going all the way back to Bruce Hershenson.
This Piraña doesn’t let go, is not limited to the truth and will take Cain down as easily as she took Meg Whitman down.
Sad to say but true. Our only option is to get Sarah back in the race or else Romney will be the last man standing and the nominee
The two BKs means that she CANNOT handle money...so when someone drags a $100 bill in front of her, she will certainly do what it takes to snatch it.
Even if that weren’t the case, my vote and my money stay with Cain UNTIL I hear details of his past felony conviction. Anything less, and he meets my standards for president, as I set them at the same level as Clinton’s supporters. In other words, I WILL NOT PERMIT the media to tell me who I should and should not vote for.
So it’s CAIN ALL THE WAY...until that felony conviction comes in (as if it will).
This lady makes unconfirmed accusation's and the MSM goes to the bank with it with no background information on her what so ever!....
No double standard here Folks....move along..
The guy she was embroiled in a paternity suit with, West Naze, is the Executive VP of a subsidiary of News Corp, which also owns Fox News. The suits and countersuits between the two of them went on for many years. It must have been quite acrimonious. Which makes it even more ironic that her current fiancee (with whom she has been cohabiting for a few years without benefit of marriage) has "friended" West Naze on facebook.
Oh, and just a small point of interest, Allred claimed in the presser that this woman is a registered Republican. There’s a link on that same thread I referenced in previous post that shows the woman is, in fact, not registered to vote.
If it were nearly ANYONE other than Allred who brought this skank forward I would attempt to believe it. But Gloria has used up all her cred over the years peddling Feminist PC crap, so, in my opinion, she’s outta’ gas!
It would be interesting to know the outcome of the paternity test by the HUSBAND of this new “victim” and whether the child really DID belong to the HUSBAND or to SOMEONE ELSE!
I hope these charges are not true. But if it's not true, then Cain should be able to successfully show some kind of facts that counter the lies.
However, if any of this were true the best thing Cain could have done from the get go would have been to belly up, admit the wrong doing, and show that he's changed his heart and actions. But we're now down the road of denial. I hope this stuff isn't true but if any of it is, at this point, I think he's got a problem.
CAin may not have called this woman “sweetie”..
There appears to be nothing “sweet” there..