[Sudetenland]

Cain could completely eliminate all of this by simply doing what you demand of this woman. All he has to do is pass a lie detector test. Instead, he and his campaign have decided to clam up.

[goldstategop]

Please. Cain has no reason to testify. We’re not in a court of law and to quote liberals, the alleged charges do not even rise to the level of a serious offense.

My friend, where’s the beef? The burden is on the accuser.

[Retired Greyhound]

In 2001 came Bialek's second personal bankruptcy

You're kidding, right?

First of all, it's customary for the accuser to have to prove their charge.

Second, lie detector tests are not reliable.

[NoLibZone]

"Cain could completely eliminate all of this by simply doing what you demand of this woman. All he has to do is pass a lie detector test. Instead, he and his campaign have decided to clam up."

Not a good idea.

After passing , the tejans will simply say that he doesn't consider such and such harassment and this is why he passed.

Outside of tejas , such allegations places the burden of proof on the accuser.

[Publius6961]

Cain could completely eliminate all of this by simply doing what you demand of this woman. All he has to do is pass a lie detector test. Instead, he and his campaign have decided to clam up.

Where did you come from?
Only the useless progressives have the b**** to suggest an innocent accused to "prove" his innocence. If that is the new standard, there is a much higher profile suspect I would prefer to start with.