[Responsibility2nd]

MAYBE IF I SHOUT - YOU WILL GET IT.

I AM NOT ATTACKING HERMAN CAIN.

I’LL TRY TYPING SLOW - SO YOU WILL GET IT.

I

A M

N O T

A T T A C K I N G

H E R M A AN

C A I N.

But guess what? I AM attacking Newt Gingrich. But here’s your chance - if you stay on topic and not wander off:

Here’s your chance to say ANYTHING constructive of marital infedility.

[samtheman]

Why would you bring Newt Gingrich into a discussion of how the establishment is trying to lynch Herman Cain?

Unless you believe Newt Gingrich is a party to that lynching.

Or unless you believe it’s not a lynching, that the establishment is justified in putting a noose around Herman Cain’s neck, and that the only appropriate response in that case is to deflect public attention to “some other bad guy”?

So which is it?

Are you trying to deflect attention to “some other bad guy” or do you believe that Newt is in cahoots with the lynch mob?

And remember, it was YOU who brought New Gingrich into a discussion involving the attempted lynching of Herman Cain, not ME.

Just please remember that.