And that’s the only point I’ve made and I’ve been attacked by the Cainbots like a pack of rabid dogs. The fanaticism about Cain is fascinating at one level, since it is very similar to that of the Clinton defenders, but it also shows an ugly strain of misogyny that I never realized was also present in conservatives. Very disappointing.
RE: . The fanaticism about Cain is fascinating at one level, since it is very similar to that of the Clinton
The comparison is NOT VALID for the following reasons — Clinton was known to LIE, not only in court (i.e., on Paula Jones, where he was finally stripped of his law license ), but also to the American public ( everybody knows Monica Lewinsky).
In the case of Herman Cain, we are WAITING for EVIDENCE ( READ: CREDIBLE EVIDENCE) of actual Sexual Harassment.
A man is innocent until proven guilty beyond reasonable doubt.
You simply cannot compare the two and you also cannot call Cain’s defenders misogynists.
If you want to SHOW US YOUR EVIDENCE. That’s all we ask.
You’re sick. My posts have not been misogynistic. They have focused on how you Perrybots, both men and women, make false and obnoxious attacks against Cain. You all act like a bunch of harpies. If you don’t like the comparison, then don’t cause the comparison.
I will not apologize for what I’ve said. It’s an accurate statement brought on by your own actions. Over the past several weeks, moreso since your candidate has dropped in the polls, you’ve done nothing but go after Cain, and disparage his supporters as well. We’re sick of it and will give it back in kind whenever we encounter it. You asked for it, well, you own it.
It has been very ugly. And I simply don’t understand the insane devotion to a personality. I thought conservatives were more mature than that, but I guess not.