Too bad you didn’t read it. The research backs up the assertion that Cain was, at best, an average CEO. There’s a talking point that Cain was some superstar CEO, which he clearly wasn’t. That doesn’t lessen his resume, but just sheds additional light on his ACTUAL accomplishments, not his campaign back story. A man with no political record has nothing but rhetoric and a work background. Vetting is good.
They don’t want vetting. I’m resigned that this will be the election where supposed conservatives will be acting as the liberals did in the past. A result of being so pompous that it couldn’t happen to them, as they are so well informed.
Sorry, but I feel no obligation to read some poster's rambling, thousand word screeds. Those were articles, not posts. Better to make your point with a few pertinent facts, and link back to more in-depth research.
Here's the irrefutable truth: Cain took a company that was operating in the red to the tune of billions of dollars annually, and made it profitable again. Say what you will, but I think that's better than average performance for a CEO.