We have very stupid people in Congress, passing such a meaningless piece of tripe BS is a total waste of time and money. While I trust in God, I do not need the idiots in congress to waste money on something as empty as this bill.
While they steal us blid they pass BS like this.
With the attack on saying the word, God, or Jesus, and removal of crosses and Commandments, it is time we reminded people that the fundamental principle and the most important statement in our Founding Documents is that our rights are from GOD, not man and, therefore, can never be legislated away (although SCOTUS is doing it as I speak).
Our inalienable rights come from God—not government. It is the main principle of our legal system and jurisprudence. Court cases over 200 years have stated repeatedly that we are a “Christian Nation” in legal opinions.
We need to remember our history or be destroyed like European godless countries. It is a fact in our Constitutional philosophy—no God means no inalienable rights. Separation of Church and State was in Stalin’s Constitution—never ours. First Amendment states that there should be no law to impeding the free exercise of religion——the “establishment” never happens by mentioning “words” . That Marxist twisting of the intent of the Founders is obvious by reading court opinions prior to the socialist/marxist interpretation of the 20th century.
Paul thinks our philosophy originates from Darwinism. Natural Law Theory is incompatible with it....and Natural Law Theory is the basis of Natural Rights. Darwinism denies Objective Truth—and God.
Paul seems to think our type of philosophy can exist without a God—or at least SOME states have the right to kick God out of the Constitution.
Natural Law does not condone homosexual marriage either. The concept which goes against Natural Law can never exist in our country if our Constitution means what it says. Paul thinks it doesn’t matter that we replace God’s standards with Barney Frank’s Standards of Right and Wrong.
Nothing can work with different “standards” or “rules”. It would be like playing a basketball game with everyone playing by their own rules. It would end in chaos. Rule of Law is based on God’s standards (Bible) and no other Rule of Law would be Just Law (Cicero/Locke/Blackstone). Paul needs to understand that God’s standards have to be inherent in our laws or they are arbitrary and unequal law (Locke,Cicero, Blackstone). We were founded with principles that do NOT evolve. The Founders knew that the nature of man has always been exactly the same since the beginning of history. Paul seems to think like Wilson—that the Constitution is a living, breathing document, therefore, evolves. Well, he is wrong.
Total waste of time. Question: Why do they have to reaffirm it? Can’t they just pass it to be valid, until a future Congress decides to remove it?
Or is this just some Congressmen grandstanding to show they love God and country?