Posted on 11/04/2011 6:31:27 PM PDT by presidio9
Childish personal attacks are a poor substitute for reasoned commentary
How about instead of trash talking the other candidates and their supporters you try spending your time making a case FOR your candidate instead?
are you looking in your mirror as you post? that is YOU not me...as I said, “IF someone posted they thought Cain’s tie was fugly...you would go on a tirade” LOL LOL
I know all that about Newt now. The lecture I heard him give must have been just before that.
BRAVO!
Cain is a “jive talker”He says what people want to hear without thinking that most of it is just wishful thinking.Not that most politicians don’t fit that profile, they do. I’ll stick with Rick. His biggest fault is that he isn’t making promises he can’t keep, just to please the few that cannot be pleased.
Yea, 53 years would be even before he was working in GA for the Nelson A. Rockefeller candidacy.
As Hillary’s political godmother was Eleanor Roosevelt, Newt’s godfather was Nelson Rockefeller. It’s all pretty much the same people ruining the country, but with voter consent.
Nor do I. Mitt and La Raza Rick already cover that market without a third choice.
Correct. Newt already did the cheap fold act against another Democrat president in another decade. We don't need an encore.
Hmmm . . . Very interesting. If you say “Mitt, Newt” very rapidly several times together, you get “Mute”.
Saw the last 30 minutes of it last night. Do you know if it will be replayed today?
If steadfast opposition to any discussion on so-called "global warming" is your primary issue in the upcoming election, then no, Newt Gingrich probably isn't your candidate. However, if you're looking for the smartest individual, who is best equipped fix the economy, restore America's place in the world, and return a deadlocked congress to work, then, yes, Newt ought to be your guy. The intent of that picture was obviously to appeal to independant voters, who regard Newt as the ultimate inflexible conservative. He opposed Kyoto, wants to abolish the EPA, and has stated that he won't endorse any enviornmental regulations that hurt the econmy. I call that picture crazy like a fox.
. Primary issue? Global warming is trivial compared to his support of TARP, the Prescription, Drugs Boondogle, No Child Left Behind, etc. Have you forgotten about these flaws or are you just doing your best to gild the lily?
Um, I was responding to a specific post on a specific issue. There's plenty not to like about Newt Gingrich. My candidate is Rick Santorum, but I'm under no illusions about his chances. This nomination is about Romney Vs. "not Romney," and I see Gingrich as the best alternative who can actually win.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.