Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Newt and the "next-in-line" problem
The American Thinker ^ | October 25, 2011 | Steve McCann

Posted on 11/04/2011 9:18:28 AM PDT by St. Louis Conservative

The Republican presidential nominating process must break out of its "next-in-line" syndrome. The party establishment, unable to comprehend the depth of voter angst, the desire for genuine change, and the true extent of America's current dire predicament, is still stuck in that rut as it continues its unenthusiastic but overt support for Mitt Romney, the current "next-in-line" candidate.

This is not the United States of the past sixty years, wherein it mattered relatively little which party occupied the White House or dominated the Congress. While the most dramatic steps in setting the nation on the course that has brought the country to the brink of bankruptcy were launched during the years of total Democrat control, the Republican Party, with the exception of Ronald Reagan and the Republican leaders of the House of Representatives in 1995, has been content to simply slow down the statist policies of the Democratic Party without reversing the trajectory established by them.

It is this mindset that has created the "next-in-line" process. Candidates for the Republican presidential nomination deemed to have paid their dues in a previous presidential run (or who are related to a former president) were arbitrarily moved to the front of the class. This course of action has been justified by the Republican establishment on the basis that these were the most "electable" candidates, as they supposedly appealed to the independents. The corollary to this axiom: a truly conservative candidate could not win a national election -- never mind that Ronald Reagan won in two massive landslides and bequeathed residual goodwill that resulted in the election of George H.W. Bush in 1988 as his successor.

This is the argument being used to justify the nomination of Mitt Romney. The unease among the rank-and-file Republicans regarding Romney is well-justified.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2012; hermancain; newtgingrich; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-22 last
To: swampfox101
Care to name some of those unamed allegations?

Were you alive in December 1998?

21 posted on 11/04/2011 11:51:43 AM PDT by Cyber Liberty (Cain = National Sales Tax; Perry = Amnesty for Illegals; Romney = Obamacare forever. Who's left?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]



Mash His Cute Little Nose

We're Looking For a Little Yellow

Donate Monthly
Sponsors will contribute $10 for each New Monthly Donor

22 posted on 11/04/2011 12:06:48 PM PDT by TheOldLady (FReepmail me to get ON or OFF the ZOT LIGHTNING ping list)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-22 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson