Do you understand that a veto can’t override those numbers?? The signing is in reality, a time saver.
“Do you understand that a veto can’t override those numbers??”
A principled chief executative would have vetoed the legislation and told why he was doing it. Let the legislature override his veto if they must.
Your point is false though, because Perry supported the legislation and had no qualms about signing it into law.........signing it to save time????? LOLOLOLOL That’s so weak as to be a pure nonsence of a reason......