Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rachel Maddow About the Damned Dam? (Did Big Government Build the Hoover Dam?)
National Review ^ | 11/03/2011 | Arthur Herman

Posted on 11/03/2011 6:41:26 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

Hoover Dam has become something of a liberal icon these days. President Obama points to it as an example of the sort of federally funded projects that once “unleashed all the potential in this country” — potential that his next round of stimulus will unleash again. MSNBC commentator Rachel Maddow has pointed to the 726-foot-high, 660-foot-wide dam as proof that some projects are just too big for private enterprise. “You can’t be the guy that built this,” she tells the TV screen. Only government can, is the implication.

Well, that would come as a surprise to the guy who did build it – or, rather, the guys who did, with their private companies. In the five-year process they discovered, even back then, that the biggest obstacle they faced in Black Canyon wasn’t nature or the Great Depression, but New Deal Washington.

The truth was, construction on the scale of Hoover Dam lay far beyond the powers of the federal government — in 1931 or even later. Four and a half million cubic yards of concrete — enough to build a two-lane highway from San Francisco to New York — and 19 million pounds of reinforcing steel somehow had to be moved into the middle of the Nevada wilderness to construct both the dam and a 1.2-million-horsepower electric plant. Thousands of tons of loose rock then had to be scraped by hand from the surface of Black Canyon, before massive tunnels could be dug to divert the Colorado River to power the plant and then fill a reservoir 115 miles long with a 550-mile shoreline.

The heads of the consortium of six private construction firms that won the $48 million contract, which came to be known as “the Big Six,” weren’t the kind of business leaders who would appear on a presidential jobs commission today. Idaho builders Harry Morrison and Morris Knudsen (of Morrison-Knudsen), Utah Construction’s Bill Wattis, and California road-makers Henry Kaiser and Warren Bechtel (whose company later became the bête noire of the American Left) had all left school early to do manual labor. Kaiser had quit at 14; as a teenager, Bill Wattis had pounded rail spikes for the Union Pacific Railroad; Pacific Bridge’s Charlie Shea smoked foul-smelling cigars and dressed like one of his workmen. Only the heads of the venerable San Francisco construction firm Kahn and MacDonald had ever attended college, and Alan MacDonald had been such a misfit that he was fired from 15 different jobs before partnering with Felix Kahn.

Indeed, in 1931, only Morrison and his architect Frank Crowe knew much about building dams (at one point Kahn and MacDonald had tried their hand at it and failed).

But what they all did have was experience in big construction projects and mines, and a dedicated knack for doing the impossible. They and their workers and engineers built not only the dam, but also all the roads, railways, and other infrastructure necessary to bring in their equipment and materials. Kaiser and his partners even built an entire town (today’s Boulder City) to house their 5,200-strong work force.

And through it all the Six Companies had a running battle with Washington and the Interior Department.

Interior Secretary Harold Ickes had seen the dam as essentially a federal make-work project for the unemployed. Kaiser and his colleagues had to point out that they needed men with genuine skills, not just people willing to turn up for a paycheck. Ickes wanted the door open to union organizing; the builders convinced him the key to happy workers was paying them well, not giving them a union card. Ickes wanted every federal health and safety regulation to be rigorously enforced, and counted no fewer than 70,000 violations of the letter of the contract. They patiently showed him that applying those standards would mean the dam would never be finished on time, let alone on budget.

Union organizers did turn up to agitate, and there were two strikes that halted work. But by and large, the men who worked seven days a week, ten hours a day on Hoover Dam proved union-resistant. They fought heat stroke, dust storms, falling rocks, poisonous snakes and Gila monsters, and a constant lack of clean water in temperatures that rose to 120 degrees in summer and plunged to 20 degrees in winter, and all for an average of 75 cents an hour.

But they sensed that Kaiser and the Six Companies had given them more than a paycheck at a time when one out of every five Americans were out of work. They had given them a sense of pride and accomplishment — not to mention steel safety helmets, making Hoover Dam the nation’s first “hard hat” construction job.

When the epic job was finished ahead of schedule, and some $4 million under budget, one of the workers wrote:

Abe Lincoln freed the Negroes And old Nero he burned Rome, But the Big Six helped depression When they gave the stiff a home.

When President Roosevelt came to the dedication on Sept. 30, 1935, he said, “This morning I came, I saw, and I was conquered, as everyone will be who sees for the first time this great feat of mankind.”

Except it wasn’t. Hoover Dam was the great feat of American business. If President Obama is looking for the imagination and ambition that will get this country moving again, that’s where he’ll find it, rather than in Washington.

— Arthur Herman is a visiting scholar at AEI.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: hooverdam; rachelmaddow
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last
To: woodbutcher1963

Exactly. I have also heard that there is a HUGE plan among the power elite to “re-wild” the areas with dams, along with all kinds of regs as you say, to stop them from interfering with fish spawning.

Our dams truly are under attack by the power hungry. Getting rid of the dams would also have the effect of “necessarily making our energy costs skyrocket.” As well as making a lot of people and farms thirsty downstream from them.


41 posted on 11/03/2011 8:18:56 AM PDT by TEXOKIE (The Tea Party outnumbers the Flea Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Ratman83

Narrower lanes then.


42 posted on 11/03/2011 8:24:30 AM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
My first job out of college was with Babcock & Wilcox as a field service engineer. On one job in Arizona, I took a detour to tour Hoover Dam. I was surprised to see B&W listed as a major contractor on the project on the dedication plaque. I learned my company had built an entire steel rolling mill and fabrication plant on site to build all the penstocks for the dam. Even though I joined the company 40 years after the dam was built, I still had a sense of pride for what the previous generation of engineers had accomplished in the very remote desert:


43 posted on 11/03/2011 8:27:03 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

A walking path maybe.


44 posted on 11/03/2011 8:36:59 AM PDT by Ratman83
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom
My three kids are in college or recently graduated. I swear at least 1/3 of their friends are going into “environmental law” which is nothing but obstruction of any progress.

For the last twenty years, EVERY college graduate says they want to go into "environmental law" because they know people hate lawyers and they want to sound cool.

There aren't really any environmental law jobs. Trust me, ten years from now, all of your kid's friends will be lawyers for Phillip Morris, WalMart, Exxon/Mobil, and Halliburton.

It's just like every 17 year old girl plans to be a Veterinarian.

45 posted on 11/03/2011 8:45:30 AM PDT by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: SF_Redux

Don’t be so damned stupid in your entertainment then.


46 posted on 11/03/2011 8:53:18 AM PDT by Rannug ("God has given it to me, let him who touches it beware.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: chiller
His description is accurate.

Almost all of Nevada is barren hostile rocky desert, but Hoover Dam is nowhere close to the middle of Nevada. His error was somewhat minor, but ignores Arizona. A more accurate description would have been; In the middle of the barren regions of the southwest on the Arizona-Nevada border.

47 posted on 11/03/2011 9:00:43 AM PDT by Michael.SF. (When you hear hooves, think horses, not zebras.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist

LOL. Sounds like you have them all figured out. In the end, lawyer jobs for “social justice” don’t pay squat and it is always nice to have income.


48 posted on 11/03/2011 9:08:59 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Earth to Obama!....Federal projects will not keep the economy going, IDIOT!!!


49 posted on 11/03/2011 9:10:30 AM PDT by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

When you deny that the government built Hoover Dam, you’re not making the case for limited government. You’re calling your own credibility into question, because the Feds in fact built the dam — they initiated and paid for it — using private contractors.

To deny that there are some things government should do and has done (like maintaining the military, building the highway system, going to the moon, and yeah, building Hoover Dam) is childish and does nothing to make the case for limited government.


50 posted on 11/03/2011 9:11:34 AM PDT by Blue Ink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rannug
maybe they should dam the Ohio River and flood Chicago

Huh???

LOL

51 posted on 11/03/2011 9:16:06 AM PDT by stayathomemom (Beware of kittens modifying your posts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Great article!


52 posted on 11/03/2011 9:30:40 AM PDT by rlmorel (The Rats won't be satisfied until every industry in the USA is in ruins and ripe for nationalization)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Michael.SF.

Yes, I suppose its how one reads it. In the middle of Nevada, or in the middle of wilderness.


53 posted on 11/03/2011 9:52:56 AM PDT by chiller ( Elect another batch of TPartiers and it won't matter which R we elect. WE will lead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: chiller

Actually, I think the location of the dam was a major factor in the development of Las Vegas, which was nothing in the 30’s, but the proximity of both water and power made it an ideal location for what it has become today.


54 posted on 11/03/2011 10:17:02 AM PDT by Michael.SF. (When you hear hooves, think horses, not zebras.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: SF_Redux

Loved this thread. Laughed at your post much. Thought surely you was jus jesting...

But howscome ya didn’t reply to all them fine folks questioning yer logic?


55 posted on 11/03/2011 12:50:37 PM PDT by BrandtMichaels
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BrandtMichaels

” But howscome ya didn’t reply to all them fine folks questioning yer logic? “

why?


56 posted on 11/03/2011 2:05:47 PM PDT by SF_Redux (Sarah stands for accountablility and personal responsiblity, democrats can't live with that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson