Posted on 11/02/2011 9:04:01 PM PDT by AmericanInTokyo
Donald Trump urges Herman Cain to "bring a major lawsuit against those two women if what they assert is false."
(Excerpt) Read more at video.foxnews.com ...
My case and point made by response #19.
“He is politically inexperienced.” And Romney, Gingrich, Paul, and Perry are politically experienced.”
Govenor, House Majority Leader, State Rep., Govenor. No, political experience there.
Keep taking your dumass’ to new levels. Idiot.
I will ask some people close to Mr. Trump, then. Worth considering.
My case and point made yet again in post #22.
Great spelling there, newbie!
Apparently “you’re an idiot” is a sufficient retort.
Why am I a Cain supporter?
The man has successfully ran a large business, has improved a failing business.
The man is staunchly prolife and is willing to defund obamacare and planned parenthood.
The man just gets it when he says that stupid people are ruining america.
And you expect to sway someone by insulting them? Good luck sir!
“And you expect to sway someone by insulting them? Good luck sir!”
Apparently the force is not with you this night, BenKenobi. I’m not trying to sway anyone. TwoSwords apparently has taken up a cause in that regard.
Perhaps you’ll indulge me and read the exchanges between TwoSwords and I, and follow it with a more coherent reply.
I don’t think Cain wants to play dirty politics. I think it’s beneath him personally. He’s a man of God.
However, a kick-ass research and legal team supplied by Trump could be used to defend against all the future attacks that we know will be coming. First research Cain, and find out what the opposition may have on him. But if there’s nothing there, then they can be waiting in the wings to defend and advise Cain on any future made-up attacks.
Like Gingrich said, Cain should have simply said: “I will review the issue with my staff and we will have a statement in a few days.” And then he should STOP talking until they prepare the statement, then STICK to the statement.
Yes.
Oddly you’re scoring a zero on the sway-o-meter. You may wish to try a different approach.
The process has played out leaving Cain at the top of the list.
If Sarah Palin had decdided to run, I would have had her at the top of my list, but now its Herman Cain.
You may wish to recheck the calibration on your sway-o-meter readings. After all, you’re the only one using it.
Reading through this thread and have to say you are seriously mistaken since your posts are the most idiotic on display. Also your response to the poster you call an idiot is completely uncalled for and proves your inability to discuss your points without personal venom and attack. So yes you win most idiotic poster on this thread.
Just not in ways those that got us into all this debt are experienced...who wants more of them?
Well put! The best come-back/put down line of the evening my friend. YOU WIN IT.
You make me blush,,,,,,tell me more...:O)
FReeper Mortrey for cut-to-the-chase post of the night.
Cain doesn't have to prove malice against people who aren't journalists. If the respondents were newspapers and newspapermen, he would.
“I’ll take Cain over zero/romney but what do you expect from him?.... Reagan?.... I don’t see it..... A little better than Bush won’t cut it..... You’re all infatuated with him because he’s all we have left..... IMHO....”
Sad for the party for sure....Something about Cain I don’t trust, and I was saying this before the other news broke, whether it is true or false......He ain’t no Reagan, or even a Palin for that matter.....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.