Posted on 11/02/2011 6:22:38 PM PDT by Brandonmark
Joel P. Bennett, the lawyer for one of the women who has made accusations against Mr. Cain, said that his client had decided not to go public or to make a public statement herself in an effort to shield herself from the media frenzy swirling around the situation.
Shes not going to affirmatively make any public statements or public appearances about the case, everything will be through me, Mr. Bennett said. She has a life to live and a career, and she doesnt want to become another Anita Hill.
(Excerpt) Read more at thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com ...
Well, so far it has improved his fund raising! In fact, everytime I hear another allegation I write another check.
I doubt her name will remain secret for long. That said, she is smart to at least attempt to stay out of the fray. Her life will never be the same once she has the rat media camped out on her front lawn.
Plus, there's no evidence whatsoever that his former client has spoken to him in the last 12 years.
I second that!
I don’t know about other folks experiences but I’d have to say that the bleeding edge-effect peak period of invasive political correctness in the workplace was in that era from 1998 through 2002 or so.
By “bleeding edge-effect peak” I mean the period where folks of old school ethos were getting ambushed by the politically correct scalp-seekers.
Anyone agree?
Or it was a tempest in a teapot, and she realized that in talking she would be exposed.
The atty already admitted not having any paperwork, or details.
Give the media credit: they know how to turn anything that happens in the world into some kind of argument against a Republican with national standing.
Her lawyer will be the public face.
She does not want to become another Anita Hill.
Bennett will send a statement to the NRA on Thursday
for their approval.
The statement “ would make clear that his clients version
of the events between herself
and Mr. Cain were different
from the version that the presidential
candidate has offered.”
Apparently, the media knows who both women are
and are camped outside their homes.
One outlet reported that one woman now lives in New Jersey
and the other in Maryland .
“ an ABC News investigation found that both women
are highly respected professionals who have gone
on to successful careers in
and around government.”
http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/herman-cains-accusers/story?id=14867409#.TrH4A2AUgzY
They were being protected as HANDICAPPED INDIVIDUALS.
Cain and company had few options here but the woman DID SOMETHING that singled her out as a PROBLEM.
But you'd better believe alcohol is at the bottom of this.
Now we`re at three chicken-sh*t, anonymous accusers and the “media” is running with it. They`re doing to Cain what they did to Palin, Quayle and others: isolate and attack, and if you don`t have rhetorical ammunition, make it up. The more people hear the lies, the more they`ll believe them.
This was, as he said later, settled over the phone. He may have tossed her stuff the day the check cleared.
Anonymous, you ignorant slut! Bagged-out, dried-up, slunken meat like you and Michelle Triola know the rules. If you want a contract, sign on the dotted line. Oh, but let’s all shed a tear for poor Michelle Triola. There was only testimony that she had sexual intercourse over forty times with another man while living with actor Lee Marvin. But I suppose that sort of fashionable promiscuting means nothing to you, Jane, who hops from bed to bed with the frequency of a cheap ham radio. But hell hath no fury like a woman’s scorn, and Michelle Triola, like a screeching, squealing, reptatious swamp sow is after actor Lee Marvin’s last three million dollars. I guess what you and Michelle are saying is that when you’re on your backs, the meter is running. Well, please spare us, gals, and tell us the rate’s at the top. Then we can choose which two bit tarts and bargain basement sluts to shack up with.
Now imagine if the tables were turned and the candidate were a dem... the “media” would`ve dredged up the woman`s name, her background, tax records and family members` names. And any non-disclosure agreement would count for nothing.
Well, that and she is completely full of shit.
Exactly right. A baseless story based on something that may or may not have happened 20 years, and the demoRATs & media seize on this as if it were solid. But if any similar accusations, without confirmed sources were made about any dimWit politicians, the media whores would be in a frenzy attacking the lawyer speaking on behalf of some unnamed source. What a bunch of frikkin RAT bastard hypocrites the demoRATs & media are!!!
“Well, sweetie, blue looks good on you Monika, but you have this splotch of semen on your dress. Kinda takes away from the allure of your big breasts!”
This is bs and I would say that no matter the political party of the candidate.
Either come forward with accusations or be quiet.
How do we know this woman even says anything or is even involved at this point. The lawyer could be making accusations she hasn’t made.
Plus, there was a privacy agreemement.
Either break it and speak or stay silent.
I can’t believe this 3rd hand gossip bs.
"...she doesnt want to become another Anita Hill."
Yeh...right!
I wonder if that dress is in Billy Jeff’s presidential library? Monica saved it, after all!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.