The only part I don't like is this:
Cain told his strategy guy (the guy now working for Perry) about this in 2003. The article says Cain does not regret telling him because your strategy guy needs to know everything in order to do his job.
The article concludes with this:
While some pundits have faulted the Cain campaign for knowing about the story for days and failing to develop an adequate response, campaign officials say they were completely in the dark. The candidate and his senior staff were left to wrack their brains, searching for any remark or “non-sexual gesture” that might have given offense to one of women working for 150-person trade association more than a decade ago.
But if Cain told the strategy guy about it in 2003, surely he told Mark Block about it in 2011. So what's up with Cain and the campaign claiming they had to wrack their brains? Or are we talking about different incidents?
Time will tell, I'm sure.
Why, why was Cain not prepped to handle this when it inevitably came out?
If Perry or Romney didn't pull this sick stunt now, then Obama's mobsters would be glad to do it at the most hurtful time next year.
Outside the beltway is a good thing. Amateur hour against the vicious Marxist crew is not.