Posted on 11/02/2011 9:36:37 AM PDT by Minus_The_Bear
Oklahoma political consultant Chris Wilson says if the woman behind the reported sexual harassment complaint against GOP Presidential hopeful Herman Cain is allowed to speak publicly, it'll be the end of Cain's run for the White House.
Interviewed today on KTOK's Mullins in the Morning, Wilson, of Wilson-Perkins-Allen Opinion Research headquartered in Washington, D.C. explained he was a witness to the incident. "I was the pollster at the National Restaurant Association when Herman Cain was head of it and I was around a couple of times when this happened and anyone who was involved with the NRA at the time, knew that this was gonna come up."
(Excerpt) Read more at ktok.com ...
He did donate the most to Romney. Besides, what's a Republican doing this for? Isn't Cain also a Republican?
Romney has so many political, left wing skeletons in his closet, it's Halloween every day! Why are they not trashing him instead? The Republicans should be politically slaughtering the guy!
I think the Washington RINOs are trying to choose our candidate for us again. I'm not taking their bait. I really don't care what the RINOs and pundits have to say. I'm not going to hold my nose at the booth anymore just so "the other guy doesn't win."
This time, I'm voting for who I want to vote for. No more good 'ol boys club crap. I'm not going to do the bidding of our Republican masters any more - just so THEY can keep THEIR power and privilege!!
Not a lawyer either...but of course not. A person not party to an agreement is not bound by the terms of such an agreement.
There is NO legal reason why this guy cannot tell what he saw and leave off the names.
He is fanning the flames for a reason.
Her lawyer said yesterday that Cain “broke” the rules of the settlement by making “disparaging remarks” about his client. What were those disparaging remarks? Cain, when asked, said her performance at the Nat’l Restaurant Assc. was considered “sub-par.”
Well, didn’t the woman break the settlement agreement rules first by breaking her silence with the ultimate “disparaging remarks” of sexual harassment charges against Cain, and now wants to up the ante and disclose more? Seems to me, if she wants to make this a free-for-all, he said/she said/unprovable but full disclosure, this woman owes a repayment to the Nat’l Restaurant Association of $35,000.
Even though he just did. He would not be bound by any confidentiality agreement since he wasn't party to the incident, so therefore he is making this stuff up. This has Tokyo Rove written all over it.
I don't have to be an attorney to answer this. There is no way this guy is covered. Even if he was covered it does not matter. Nor does it matter when it comes to anyone BUT Cain. I say anyone but Cain because if he is a direct party to the agreement and says names he is going to be bashed. As far as anyone else? The agreement does not matter much unless it is an agreement that falls under a court order. That does not appear to be the case here so anyone (even Cain if he wanted to) can say whatever they like. Because the reality is that the country is full of rich leftist Democrat lawyers who will do two things. One, they will make sure that the women involved will never have a legal problem (pro bono)and two, they will make sure that the women involved are compensated beyond their wildest dreams.
I'd note that Cain has not named names. Which makes the one lawyers assertions that Cain has broken the agreement a total crock. The lawyer has stated he does not have the agreement in hand and does not know what it says. How then could he even know Cain is talking about his client? Especially if there is supposed to be more than one woman?
With all that said Cain either has a campaign killing situation here because the media will bash him in to the ground or he will come out of this way on top.
Several things will happen next. One, there will be an accuser that will come forward. After she is prepped by lawyers, PR and media types. Two, Herman Cain's wife and family will step forward. The latter should have already happened and that is a red flag right now. The fact that his wife has not come forward is distressing.
He looks young in the pics. But on his website he says he’s married w/ two kids.
I don’t care if he is married and has kids, he is trying to ruin Cain with this nonsense and Perry is directing.
aka Nydia Stone is a name Im seeing and all are involved with Rove, Burkett. This is getting interesting and Im leading to Rove. What an ass. I sent an email to him the day this started cause I felt like he had something to do with this. I told him I sent Cain 100.00 on his behalf. He sent me an email back and said thanks for supporting your candidate. putz
I wonder how old this kid was when this was suppose to have happened...or does he want to spread 3 or 4th hand gossip..
Based on 20 years ago, Chris Wilson was 23...born in 1968.
If he went to college at age 18 and graduated four years later, he was 22 years old.
Barely out of diapers, in my opinion.
Someone pointed out on FR a while back that if Romney gets the Nom, the truth about Mormonism will become the top story. People will be horrified.
Found this, too:
http://www.victorygroup.com/Victory_Group_Inc./home_files/RollCall33111.pdf
Also, RedState had ‘something’ and it’s no longer in the cache:
Wilson Research Strategies | RedState
breakingnews.redstate.com/tags/tag/wilson-research-strategies/Cached
You +1’d this publicly. Undo
by Eric Olsen · How might Mitt purge his progressive past ... How Terribly Strange to be 70... by conservativecurmudgeon · Is This the Real Mitt Romney? ...
You can be 18 and married with 2 kids.
OMG! Somebody cloned Eddie Haskell!
My post wasn’t aimed at you BTW...just a response to the thread in general.
Ive been getting some scary mormon stuff via email lately. wow.
The Cainbots are a laugh riot for sure. They must defend their idol; all naysayers are the enemy of truth, justice, and the American way!
You betcha!
Sluts they are I tell ya! haha
After Bill Clinton, I resolved never to care about any 'scandals' that become attached to candidates that I support. Clinton lowered the bar so far, that you need a backhoe to locate it. Chose a scandal category, and Clinton can claim a scandal that can top whatever anyone else can be accused of. Financial? Whitewater, Cattle Futures, Rose Law firm. etc. Political? Pardon selling, firing all U.S. attorneys. Legal? Perjury and suborning perjury, FBI files. Sex Scandals? Are you kidding me? Paula, Monica, Juanita and on and on. And these were the biggies. Sandwiched in we had Vince Foster, Madison Guaranty, Susan McDougal.
The Democrats lionize Clinton. After Clinton, they broke the mold (after disinfecting it). Sleaze, they name is Bill Clinton, and if he gets a pass for all that, then I am not going to torpedo a candidate that I agree with for far less. Look, I would take a true conservative that occasionally grabbed a woman's bootie than a morally pure Barack Obama. Such is the legacy of Bill Clinton.
Typical Sooner
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.