Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cain Accuser Got a Year’s Salary in Severance Pay
NY Times ^ | November 1st 2011 | JIM RUTENBERG, JEFF ZELENY and MIKE McINTIRE

Posted on 11/02/2011 4:23:38 AM PDT by Cardhu

WASHINGTON — The National Restaurant Association gave $35,000 — a year’s salary — in severance pay to a female staff member in the late 1990s after an encounter with Herman Cain, its chief executive at the time, made her uncomfortable working there, three people with direct knowledge of the payment said on Tuesday.

The woman was one of two whose accusations of sexual harassment by Mr. Cain, now a Republican candidate for president, led to paid severance agreements during his 1996-99 tenure at the association. Disclosure of the scale of the severance further challenged his initial description of the matter as a “witch hunt,” as did new descriptions from the woman’s friends and colleagues of her level of discomfort at work.

Adding to the pressure on Mr. Cain, a lawyer for the second woman called on the restaurant association to release her from a confidentiality agreement signed as part of her settlement, raising the prospect that she could publicly dispute Mr. Cain’s account of what happened. The lawyer said the confidentiality agreement had left her unable to respond to Mr. Cain’s denials of any inappropriate behavior toward the women.

“He’s basically saying: ‘I never harassed anyone. These claims have no merit,’ ” said the lawyer, Joel P. Bennett of Washington, who represented the woman in her initial agreement. “And I’m sure my client would have a comeback to that.”

The precise nature of the encounters between Mr. Cain and the two women remained murky. He has said over the past two days that he joked with one of the women about her height. But he has not addressed what happened with the other woman — the one said to have received the $35,000 payment. Her friends and colleagues said she had told them at the time that she was deeply...

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cain; nra; perry; severance
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last

1 posted on 11/02/2011 4:23:41 AM PDT by Cardhu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cardhu

$35,000 is nothing. Attorneys would have eaten up that much in fees in one month.


2 posted on 11/02/2011 4:26:24 AM PDT by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cardhu

“And I’m sure my client would have a comeback to that.”

BS!! These charges were kept mum until it became obvious that Cain is capable of winning the nomination.

Besides, none of this or anything these claimants say matters at this point.

The Liberal smear is by now TOO pervasive and predictable to carry any weight with anyone!!!


3 posted on 11/02/2011 4:28:12 AM PDT by SMARTY ("The man who has no inner-life is a slave to his surroundings. "Henri Frederic Amiel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cardhu

Any dead cats turn up on her deck?


4 posted on 11/02/2011 4:29:50 AM PDT by Steely Tom (Obama goes on long after the thrill of Obama is gone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mazda77

Ping.


5 posted on 11/02/2011 4:30:39 AM PDT by onyx (PLEASE SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC BY DONATING NOW! Sarah's New Ping List - tell me if you want on it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cardhu

Glad to see that non-disclosure agreement they signed is working out so well. </sarcasm>


6 posted on 11/02/2011 4:31:01 AM PDT by SoJoCo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeaHawkFan
Probably one-third in fees plus expenses. Perhaps she now wants more.
7 posted on 11/02/2011 4:31:51 AM PDT by fatnotlazy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: fatnotlazy

It looks like the old “we know what you are...we’re just trying to figure out the price.”


8 posted on 11/02/2011 4:35:06 AM PDT by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Cardhu

You aint seen nuttin yet folks—just wait until Barry’s campaign has a nominated target!


9 posted on 11/02/2011 4:35:26 AM PDT by BTCM (Death and destruction is the only treaty Muslims comprehend.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoJoCo
It must have been a conditional settlement. The condition being: “If Mr. Cain is likely to become President of the United States, claimants may AGAIN spew any and as much libelous BS they want and with perfect impunity”!!!
10 posted on 11/02/2011 4:36:00 AM PDT by SMARTY ("The man who has no inner-life is a slave to his surroundings. "Henri Frederic Amiel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Cardhu

She’s probably thinking she’ll get many times over that $35K amount with a single televised interview.


11 posted on 11/02/2011 4:36:48 AM PDT by ScottinVA (Hurrah me boys, for FREEDOM! `Tis the risin` o` the moon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cardhu

Looks like Jim Rutenberg, Jeff Zeleny and Mike McIntire are all vying for the coveted and esteemed ‘Jonathan Martin Excellence in Journalism’ Award.

Do I realllly need a ‘sarc’ tag for this?


12 posted on 11/02/2011 4:37:07 AM PDT by mkjessup (I stand with Herman Cain, a God-fearing, Jesus-loving, Constitution-honoring PATRIOT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fatnotlazy

I was referring to the Associations legal bills. The complainer probably ended up with $20-24,000 after legal bills and taxes.


13 posted on 11/02/2011 4:37:35 AM PDT by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Cardhu

So why did this not come out during his Senate campaign?


14 posted on 11/02/2011 4:39:46 AM PDT by doodad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ScottinVA

Once a shake-down artist, always a shake-down artist..

Sell to the higest bidder and enhance her story.

She won’t be under oath.


15 posted on 11/02/2011 4:40:04 AM PDT by onyx (PLEASE SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC BY DONATING NOW! Sarah's New Ping List - tell me if you want on it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: FReepers; everyone; All
404 - KEEP IT AWAY!

IF you have already donated, this isn't to you, because you already know that Free Republic needs all regular users and members to donate to help keep our lights on.

If you are a regular user but haven't yet donated, today would be a most opportune time. Our 4th Quarter FReepathon is into November and we'd like to wrap it up ASAP.

Please help keep Free Republic's lights on by making your donation today. Simply Click here!


Thanks very much, everyone!

16 posted on 11/02/2011 4:41:00 AM PDT by onyx (PLEASE SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC BY DONATING NOW! Sarah's New Ping List - tell me if you want on it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cardhu

When a female accuses a manager or CEO of sexual harassment it is cheaper to pay the complainer off than to defend the charge in court especially as the definition of harassment is that the complainant decided to feel offended. This sort of condition is why companies, especially small employers are trying to hire fewer females and minorities. Such employees can too often make some quick money by crying sexual harassment or racial bias etc. Black women employees are especially dangerous.


17 posted on 11/02/2011 4:41:18 AM PDT by arthurus (Read Hazlitt's "Economics In One Lesson.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arthurus

And just how much money was Mary Jo Kopechne’s family paid? Don’t know? Of course, the press wasn’t interested in that.


18 posted on 11/02/2011 4:45:53 AM PDT by laconic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Cardhu

Looks like from this article the “sexual harrassment” issue was not even the primary reason of this second accusser’s separation from the organization.


19 posted on 11/02/2011 4:46:29 AM PDT by 07Jack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doodad
So why did this not come out during his Senate campaign?

I suspect it didn't surface because he was so far behind Johnny Isaksen, there was no "threat" of his winning. This is clear evidence they're taking Cain's candidacy seriously, so it was deemed necessary to clear him off the field. This is the same crap pulled against Jack Ryan in that Senate race vs. Obama in IL back in 2004.

20 posted on 11/02/2011 4:47:25 AM PDT by ScottinVA (Hurrah me boys, for FREEDOM! `Tis the risin` o` the moon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson