So, Mr. Cain, have you stopped sexually harassing women... 
and beating your wife?
Howie Carr list ping
Cain just had his biggest fundraising day. Ha, goes to show how much a non-issue this is.
Any woman, any time she wants, for any reason she wants, can accuse a man of making a gesture that, while not overtly sexual, made them uncomfortable. They don’t need any witnesses, and they don’t need any facts to back them up. The man doesn’t even have to know he did it.
The GOPbot Establishement and Karl Rove better buy a clue. They have everyone from Rush Limbaugh to Sean Hannity defending Cain.
REALLY stupid politic move by the GOP machine on this one. Instead of “getting Cain” they have given him a serious boost.
Its the seriousness of the charge..We have been told that so much the sheeple believe it.
Usually, if there is an 'offense', the offender is outa there!
So, Mr. Cain, have you stopped sexually harassing women... and beating your wife?
People autoatically assume that when a person is accused of wrongdoing, then the accusation must be true. It all sounds to me like a disgruntled former employee was trying to extort money from her former employer. It’s unfortunate that the association did settle some money on the accuser. However, there are times when it is more prudent and cost effective to settle than spend large amounts of money on a trial and maybe an appeal. A settlement does not necessarily mean there was any wrongdoing.
Unfortunately, many people are not aware of how the legal system works, and Rev. Cain has many enemies willing to exploit that ignorance in order to bring him down. And IMHO those enemies are members of Rev. Cain’s own party.
Which party, Howie?
Which party?
Why would Obama do it NOW? (He would not).
When I worked in corporate America, my bosses made me uncomfortable plenty of times:
“Where’s your report?”
“What’s this item on your expense account?”
“It’s 10:00 AM and you’re just getting here?”
I don’t have to tell you what would have happened had I tried to make an issue out of this “discomfort.”
What do we have here?
....a false charge of sexual innuendo is promoted to sexual harassment, presumed to true and then equated to the psycho-killer behavior....
Al Sharpton failed to note his guest’s obvious racism in Shrum and Milbanks statements.
The FBI found Juanita's story 'credible' but the MSM refused to cover it.
That's the story. The MSM refused to cover a credible rape charge against Bill Clinton when he was running for President..
Every time - EVERY TIME - the Cain charge is brought up - WE NEED TO TALK ABOUT Juanita's RAPE - and the MSM cover-up of that rape charge - the 60 Minutes cover up of Flowers - and all the rest of the press 'dem butt kissing' that goes on. I suspect they'll shut down the story rather that deal with their own faults...
Why? Apparently NOW is selective about who gets the presumption of innocence.
"It is deeply insulting that this is being called political," Matson said. "Sexual harassment allegations are always about a woman who is simply trying to go to work."
Complete and utter BS. There are all kinds of motivations for these complaints, and some of them are truly disgraceful.
And of course the media is silent about the mystery man
occupying the White House and his past.