Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CharlesWayneCT

RE: The Settlement.

Let’s assume that one exists...

1) Did Cain sign it?

If he did, then the following possibilities apply:

A) He really DID harrass the women

In which case, the next question becomes, what was
the NATURE of the harrassment?

B) He did not harrass the women, but decided to settle to prevent any ugly publicity.

2) If he did not, who signed it on behalf of the NRA ( National Restaurant Association)?


52 posted on 10/31/2011 12:00:54 PM PDT by SeekAndFind (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: SeekAndFind
B) He did not harrass the women, but decided to settle to prevent any ugly publicity.

Wrong B) above. B) He did not harrass the women, but the corporation decided to "settle" because that's what the corporation's attorneys recommended because it was cheaper for the company than dragging things out and the women were A-okay with a cash settlement just to shut up and go away.

If so, did they void the conditions of the settlement by revealing this to the Politico and are they now liable for repaying, with interest, the full amounts of the settlement?
53 posted on 10/31/2011 12:10:02 PM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson