Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Romneycare Official: 'I Would Never' Try to Reduce Health Costs (Romney 2006 vs. Romney 2011)
Forbes ^ | 2011-10-28 | Avik Roy

Posted on 10/29/2011 3:06:47 PM PDT by rabscuttle385

Jennifer Haberkorn of Politico has a new article up that addresses one of the biggest liabilities of Mitt Romney’s health care law in Massachusetts: the fact that health-insurance premiums in Massachusetts have skyrocketed since the law was put into place. Even though Romney promised at the time that the law would reduce the cost of health insurance (sound familiar?), today, as Haberkorn reports, Romneycare’s defenders claim that the law was never meant to reduce health costs. Indeed, Timothy Murphy, Secretary of Health and Human Services under Romney, told her that reducing costs was not “the proper role of government.”

Huh? Here’s the full excerpt (emphasis added):

Timothy Murphy, who was Massachusetts Health and Human Services secretary while Romney was governor, said he doubted the governor would have supported any cost regulations for philosophical reasons.

“People say we didn’t do cost controls,” said Murphy, who is now president and CEO of Beacon Health Strategies, a managed behavioral health care company. “I would never do that in a million years…We didn’t think it was the proper role of government.”

So: massively increasing state health spending is ok, but making sure that this spending doesn’t drive the state bankrupt, or harm taxpayers, isn’t “the proper role of government.” If this is an accurate representation of Murphy’s views, it’s unfathomably irresponsible.

And let’s be clear: far from being a peripheral aspect of Romney’s plan, reducing health costs for the middle class was the central political argument Romney deployed in its favor.

(snip)

...explained Romney in an April 2006 op-ed for the Wall Street Journal. “Every uninsured citizen in Massachusetts will soon have affordable health insurance and the costs of health care will be reduced,” he promised in the op-ed’s second paragraph. (Emphasis added.)

(Excerpt) Read more at forbes.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: biggovernment; deathcare; deathpanels; fascism; healthcare; obamacare; rino; romeny4romney; romney; romney4cultofdeath; romney4deathcare; romney4deathpanels; romney4hillarycare; romney4illegalcare; romney4kolob; romney4obamacare; romney4romneycare; romneybringsdeath; romneycare; romneydeathpanels; romneytruthfile
...Massachusetts’ highest-in-the-nation insurance premiums...the Bay State separated itself from the pack in 2006, the year Romney signed his landmark health legislation, and hasn’t slowed down since.

FUMR!!!

1 posted on 10/29/2011 3:06:49 PM PDT by rabscuttle385
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: FReepers

DONATE


2 posted on 10/29/2011 3:16:26 PM PDT by onyx (PLEASE SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC BY DONATING NOW! Sarah's New Ping List - tell me if you want on it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

IB4 the RomneyBots relate this thread to Romneys religion of choice...


3 posted on 10/29/2011 3:32:49 PM PDT by Tennessee Nana (If we give Sandy a ladder will she preach from the temple roof)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

IB4 the RomneyBots relate this thread to Romneys religion of choice...


4 posted on 10/29/2011 3:32:59 PM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #5 Removed by Moderator

To: Vide

Not funny, just disgusting. As I reported, little wonder people are leaving this site. It’s been turned over to morons like you.


6 posted on 10/29/2011 4:09:02 PM PDT by bfree (The revolution is coming - OBAMI IS THE ENEMY OF FREEDOM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana

Remember Mittster is a little god....whatever he says is his reality.....


7 posted on 10/29/2011 4:14:03 PM PDT by pointsal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

So you are in favor of the government imposing price controls on doctors?


8 posted on 10/29/2011 5:03:13 PM PDT by kenavi (Raise taxes on the "fortunate few": lottery-winners.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kenavi
So you are in favor of the government imposing price controls on doctors?

Ever hear of a little Government program called Medicaid?

9 posted on 10/29/2011 5:06:41 PM PDT by Lurker (The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Lurker
Ever hear of a little Government program called Medicaid?

Yes, and Medicare too. They cost us more than anything outside of national defense. OK with you if we discuss who should make the decisions how much to pay a doctor or hospital, and how those decisions are made?
10 posted on 10/30/2011 5:30:27 AM PDT by kenavi (Raise taxes on the "fortunate few": lottery-winners.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: kenavi
OK with you if we discuss who should make the decisions how much to pay a doctor or hospital, and how those decisions are made?

Sure, but it'll be a short one with me. Those decisions should be made by willing buyers and sellers free of Government mandates. In other words, the free market.

11 posted on 10/30/2011 8:12:57 AM PDT by Lurker (The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Lurker
Those decisions should be made by willing buyers and sellers free of Government mandates. In other words, the free market.

I agree.

I think that's all Romney's former aide was saying.
12 posted on 10/30/2011 9:08:00 AM PDT by kenavi (Raise taxes on the "fortunate few": lottery-winners.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: kenavi
I think that's all Romney's former aide was saying.

Other than that pesky "willing buyers" part I might agree with you. Trouble is that Romney and his idiot advisors forced every MA resident at the point of a gun to buy his stupid product. That's why I won't support or vote for Romney.

He's a nasty little statist.

13 posted on 10/30/2011 9:30:36 AM PDT by Lurker (The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson