To: Sam Clements
a civil war, followed by California becoming North California and South California.
7 posted on
10/29/2011 12:48:40 PM PDT by
HiTech RedNeck
(ya don't tug on Supermans cape/ya don't spit into the wind...and ya don't speak well of Mitt to Jim!)
To: HiTech RedNeck
As long as they don’t bring their idears to Alaska, they can do whatever they want.
8 posted on
10/29/2011 12:52:29 PM PDT by
Eska
To: HiTech RedNeck
North, Central and South would work better to divide us up. Everything north of Sacramento can be one state, everything south of Bakersfield can be a second, and everything in between can be a third. SoCal, NorCal and CentCal would group like items pretty well, assuming we were all our own states.
There's really no hope for us trapped behind the lines here anyway, but at least we'd be free from the cash-hungry oppression asylum of Sacramento. ;-)
12 posted on
10/29/2011 12:57:30 PM PDT by
Steel Wolf
("Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master." - Gaius Sallustius Crispus)
To: HiTech RedNeck
I like the idea of splitting up California as well. However, any region which includes San Francisco or Los Angeles will be destroyed forever by the liberals and the Taker class. Even Orange County, where I live, can not be relied upon because so many of our young people have been completely brainwashed by their professors. Within the next ten years Orange County will go democRAT.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson