Skip to comments.
Apple building 174 acre solar farm to power North Carolina data center
9To5Mac.com ^
Posted on 10/29/2011 9:00:47 AM PDT by matt04
Charlotte Observer is reporting that Apple has begun work building a 174 acre solar farm to power their new Maiden, North Carolina data center. The data center, located in Catawba County, was revealed by Steve Jobs during the iOS 5 keynote at WWDC this year, and will be partly responsible for powering iCloud. It was revealed earlier this year that Apple was purchasing land around the data center. Now we know why.
Permits issued by Catawba County show that the Cupertino, Calif., company has been approved to reshape the slope of some of the 171 acres of vacant land it owns on Startown Road, opposite the data center, in preparation of building a solar farm.
(Excerpt) Read more at 9to5mac.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: North Carolina
KEYWORDS: apple; datacenter; maiden; northcarolina; solar
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-95 next last
To: Noamie
Vista pollution. Yuk. In beautiful North Carolina as well...
21
posted on
10/29/2011 9:28:57 AM PDT
by
fooman
(Get real with Kim Jung Mentally Ill about proliferation)
To: Perdogg
I hope they have a terrific water source. Washing 174 acres of panels isn’t a one well job.
22
posted on
10/29/2011 9:29:35 AM PDT
by
Noamie
Do You Want FR To Survive?
Click The Starving Forum Skeleton To Donate
Then Support Your Forum
23
posted on
10/29/2011 9:35:48 AM PDT
by
DJ MacWoW
(America! The wolves are here! What will you do?)
To: cowtowney
Less their solar costs is a hell of a lot. It isn’t just install and hook up and that’s it. Solar panels require intensive maintenance. Despite your claims that it’s private capital I doubt it is all funded out of Apple’s pocket. There are huge subsidies involved from the govt to encourage these things. Apple is obviously taking advantage of every penny of subsidy. I suspect the primary purpose is for PR though. They have billions and their clientele is “green” so it’s good business to have pictures of some nice shiny mirrors outside they can put in their sales literature. They’re certainly not doing it because it’s cost effective.
24
posted on
10/29/2011 9:36:30 AM PDT
by
saganite
(What happens to taglines? Is there a termination date?)
To: saganite
There is a 30% tax credit on the installation of the solar panels for both business and residential. But allowing some one to sell back the power in some states is the kicker.
25
posted on
10/29/2011 9:45:51 AM PDT
by
Perdogg
To: fooman
Vista wasn’t that bad, but has been superseded by 7 anyway. Wait, what?
26
posted on
10/29/2011 9:47:08 AM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(It's never a bad time to FReep this link -- https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: matt04
Other Austin Energy renewable projects include the Webberville Solar Farm, which is located east of Austin on 300 acres of land owned by the city. The large array of 270 watt photovoltaic modules will generate a total of 30 megawatts for the city and is set to be online in December. The city is paying $10 million a year for 25 years as the solar farms sole client to Gemini Solar Development Co., the farms owner and operator.
27
posted on
10/29/2011 9:47:45 AM PDT
by
Arrowhead1952
(Dear God, thanks for the rain, but please let it rain more in Texas. Amen.)
To: Cringing Negativism Network; cowtowney; 2ndDivisionVet; Perdogg; Swordmaker
28
posted on
10/29/2011 9:48:10 AM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(It's never a bad time to FReep this link -- https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: saganite
Let’s all of us meet back here ten years from now and discuss how well this project has worked out.
29
posted on
10/29/2011 9:49:36 AM PDT
by
donhunt
(Certified and proud "Son of a Bitch".)
To: CodeToad
I recall a article about some environmental group protesting Apple’s move to build the data center because it’s power source would primarily be from nuclear and coal based on the area it is built in. No coincidence that the electricity is cheap in that area.
30
posted on
10/29/2011 9:51:43 AM PDT
by
matt04
To: matt04
One hundred and seventy-four acres dedicated to powering, if not one building, then one endeavor, a data center, in a group of buildings.
There is terminal stupidity behind this.
31
posted on
10/29/2011 9:59:51 AM PDT
by
RobinOfKingston
(The instinct toward liberalism is located in the part of the brain called the rectal lobe.)
To: cowtowney
Its private capital. I am going to assume theyve run the numbers. No way this is a PR move.
You are misinformed about the economics of solar power. This project is a product of heavy government subsidies, not private investment decisions. Subsidies permeate this project from federal/state tax credits, utility forced investments, utility power mandates, and net metering (forcing utilities to offset power use with excess solar power generated). Without this boatload of subsidies, this project would be laughed out of Apple's capital budgeting mix. The subsidies are paid by higher government borrowing, taxes, and utility rates. Most of the manufacturing is performed in China.
To: matt04
That’s a whole bunch of valuable land gobbled up for this project.
33
posted on
10/29/2011 10:11:38 AM PDT
by
lurk
To: matt04
oy. well, at least when there's nothing left to eat, there might be just enough power to keep it warm.
34
posted on
10/29/2011 10:23:09 AM PDT
by
the invisib1e hand
(...then they came for the guitars, and we kicked their sorry faggot asses into the dust)
To: matt04
so wtf ever happened to “not scarring the land” or whatever? You can’t strip-mine, but you can put turn a countryside into a freaking eyesore junkyard of metal and plastic?
35
posted on
10/29/2011 10:24:36 AM PDT
by
the invisib1e hand
(...then they came for the guitars, and we kicked their sorry faggot asses into the dust)
To: the invisib1e hand
Like a lot of things with land use, zoning, and politics.
Follow the money.....
36
posted on
10/29/2011 10:28:02 AM PDT
by
nascarnation
(DEFEAT BARAQ 2012 DEPORT BARAQ 2013)
To: RJS1950
I wouldn’t call Apple Co. socialist. I’ve always thought of Steve Jobs as a liberal Capitalist.
To: nascarnation
Like a lot of things with land use, zoning, and politics. Follow the money.....If you're suggesting that there's a fatass tax break that can be traced up the road to Pennsylvania Avenue, I'd say you're probably right.
38
posted on
10/29/2011 10:31:55 AM PDT
by
the invisib1e hand
(...then they came for the guitars, and we kicked their sorry faggot asses into the dust)
To: MinorityRepublican
I wouldnt call Apple Co. socialist. Ive always thought of Steve Jobs as a liberal Capitalist. Steve Jobs no longer runs the company. It's just another corporation now, an annex of the burgeoning fascist state.
39
posted on
10/29/2011 10:32:52 AM PDT
by
the invisib1e hand
(...then they came for the guitars, and we kicked their sorry faggot asses into the dust)
To: cowtowney
Well, of course it is at least partially a PR move. Why do you think you are reading about it?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-95 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson