Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Personal Responsibility
no, we are not better off with Obama than Romney. Obama HAS to go. Ideally, in a landslide.

One is Pepsi, the other Coke. If one has to go they both do. Weird Willy is a chameleon that can't be trusted. If Barky was governor of Massachusetts instead would it have been much different? It would have been Obamacare I, instead of Romneycare. At least we know which devil Barky is: a Marxist with the Democrat brand. With Weird Willy we get the same only the Republican brand gets the blame. Instead of sitting out this election I might have to vote for Barky to cancel out your vote.

What motivates Weird Willy to run for President? It isn't out of a love for America. He appears to have unbridled ambition driven by vanity. And he's a jerk. That isn't good.

104 posted on 10/25/2011 10:38:14 AM PDT by Reeses (Have you mocked a Democrat today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]


To: Reeses

We should make sure Romney is not the nominee. But if our worst case scenario comes to pass and he is, he has to win. It’s not a cut and dry “both are bad” debate. Obama is DESTROYING the country. Romney would be bad but 4 years of Obama would be worse.

On a scale of 1-100 of “who should not be President” where 100 is “Best President in history” and 1 is “Worst president in history”. Obama’s a 1. Romney’s probably a 20 or 30.

Both are bad but Obama’s on a different level. He HAS to lose.


131 posted on 10/25/2011 6:35:46 PM PDT by Personal Responsibility (Get ready for an aberration of epic proportions! - Herman Cain 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson