We should make sure Romney is not the nominee. But if our worst case scenario comes to pass and he is, he has to win. It’s not a cut and dry “both are bad” debate. Obama is DESTROYING the country. Romney would be bad but 4 years of Obama would be worse.
On a scale of 1-100 of “who should not be President” where 100 is “Best President in history” and 1 is “Worst president in history”. Obama’s a 1. Romney’s probably a 20 or 30.
Both are bad but Obama’s on a different level. He HAS to lose.
I just read a bio on Mittens and he's a business turn around artist, so you're right, it can't be all bad because turning America around is what we need. Herman Cain is also a turn around artist, not blue blood but more likable. Mittens has made more money than he knows what to do with so that has lost it's motivation value to him. The next step once someone is rich is power and politics. A big problem though is the privileged rich white man that has laid off others to make money is going to stir envy, among all leftists but also the important swing voters. The affirmative action man is going to play victim and blame the white man, which works. It's going to be a very tough win if Mittens is the nominee.
Barky is just a puppet, an actor that can't remember his lines so needs dual TelePrompTers at all times. The continuing failure of the economy is because of his evil Marxist puppet masters, not the Marxist useful idiot. If Barky replaces his string pulling team he's effectively a new President. The second 4 years would likely be more Clinton, less Marx.
On a personal level Barky is more likable than Mittens. Cain is more likable. Mittens is the backstabbing brown nosing prick we've all had to work with at one time or another. I'm really worried he's going to blow this sale just like McCain and Dole. Mittens was not successful converting any French into Mormons. Even though that was a difficult task, it shows making the sale to the common folk is not his strong suit.