[556x45]

To me it seems a huge waste of effort. While the House is very likely to pass it the Senate may or may not and the Infester of the WH certainly wont. I very much doubt the veto will be overrode. There are other more pressing issues. It would have been far better to bring it up when there was a chance of it becoming law.

[neverdem]

To me it seems a huge waste of effort. While the House is very likely to pass it the Senate may or may not and the Infester of the WH certainly wont. I very much doubt the veto will be overrode. There are other more pressing issues. It would have been far better to bring it up when there was a chance of it becoming law.

See comment# 19. At the very least, it helps to get rid of fair weather friends of the Second Amendment like Mark Pryor and Richard Lugar in the Senate.

[ExSoldier]

To me it seems a huge waste of effort. While the House is very likely to pass it the Senate may or may not and the Infester of the WH certainly wont. I very much doubt the veto will be overrode. There are other more pressing issues. It would have been far better to bring it up when there was a chance of it becoming law.

Spot on correct. This has NO chance of becoming law until conservatives take control of the Senate, extend control in the House and take the Oval. I say conservatives because if Romney is the next POTUS, it still won't happen.

[goldstategop]

It will create a campaign issue. And Democratic Senators from Red States don’t want to run against Right To Carry. Its a big issue back home. Let Obama veto it. That shows how liberal and out of touch he is with the American mainstream.

Bring it on!