Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Highschoolers horrified at gay male kiss in school play, while officials praise exposure
Life Site News ^ | 10/19/2011 | Kathleen Gilbert

Posted on 10/19/2011 4:33:43 AM PDT by IbJensen

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-135 last
To: wintertime

Great post!

Have you ever looked at any of the Barna surveys of the worldview of Christians? I remember years back one of them revealed that of a given sample of children of Baptist parents who were educated in government schools, 80%-90% graduated with a secular humanist worldview. It was pretty shocking, but even more shocking, most of my Christian friends didn’t seem to be too concerned about the implications for their own children & grandchildren.


121 posted on 10/19/2011 11:56:25 PM PDT by SecAmndmt (Arm yourselves!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: SecAmndmt
Have you ever looked at any of the Barna surveys of the worldview of Christians?
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Yes, I have. They are very discouraging.

And...I too have the same reaction when I speak to others about our corrupt godless socialist schools. Their eyes glaze over, or they simply can **not** understand what I am saying.

But....One thing is for certain. I have eliminated my contact with socialist school teachers down to the bare minimum. They are either evil or stupid.

122 posted on 10/20/2011 4:49:24 AM PDT by wintertime (I am a Constitutional Restorationist!!! Yes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: momtothree

Frankly, I don’t need to see some guy and his girlfriend doing a groping full-blown makeout session in my face either. It’s almost as if a kiss got completely devalued from when I was a kid, where it actually meant something, now it doesn’t mean all that much even with regards to heterosexual relationships, anyways, that’s one of my pet peeves, which, I know it is old fashioned, but I am one obnoxious traditionalist at times.


123 posted on 10/20/2011 6:58:51 PM PDT by Morpheus2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

Well, I personally don’t always find it amusing when a guy and his girlfriend have to do it in the middle of the hallway, not to mention obstruct my view. Either way, a kiss doesn’t seem to hold the kind of value which it used to regarding relationships.


124 posted on 10/20/2011 7:04:07 PM PDT by Morpheus2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

Someone ought to say, “Surgeon General’s Warning: Practicing Self Control, restraint, or even abstinence on sexual contact that is oral or anal greatly reduces serious risks to your health.”


125 posted on 10/20/2011 7:10:07 PM PDT by Morpheus2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

I wonder why it’s always men who get disgusted at male homosexuality and not women. Logically it should be the other way round because the more male homosexuals there are the more women there are for the remaining heterosexual males while there’s less choice for the women. Instead straight guys get off to lesbians kissing while some straight gals like me find two guys kissing to be “hot”. Just goes to show there’s no logic in sex.


126 posted on 10/21/2011 12:43:12 AM PDT by SoCal SoCon (Conservatism =/= Corporatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Morpheus2009

I agree with you. Noticeable displays of affection in public are mainly about getting attention, and have little to do with real involvement between the parties.


127 posted on 10/21/2011 4:13:30 AM PDT by Tax-chick (You could be a monthly donor, too. It's easy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Morpheus2009

You aren’t being old fashioned at all.. I agree. A stolen kiss between a girl and a boy at a Homecoming Dance is cute to me. A full groping event is crass. You want to yell, “Get a room”. Any sort of sexual behavior has become more public IMHO. It has been devalued.


128 posted on 10/21/2011 6:12:11 AM PDT by momtothree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: momtothree; Morpheus2009

I think the public displays are a result of the people’s really being bored with each other and with physical interaction in general. Nowadays, young people see it all over from early childhood, they’re constantly told that there’s nothing more important or interesting in life ... and then they find that it’s really pretty much a drag, especially if you’re involved with immature and self-centered partners (as how could you not be, given their age and culture?).

So the only thing that’s the least exciting is making a scene in public (or on Youtube, etc.). It’s all about getting a reaction from observers.


129 posted on 10/21/2011 7:04:48 AM PDT by Tax-chick (You could be a monthly donor, too. It's easy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

In the case at my son’s Homecoming Dance... I think it was a way to get a reaction. From my understanding, the “couple” found it amusing that another kid threw up. I am glad that I have taught/still teaching my children that hand holding is fine, a smooch is okay... anything past that is private and not for public viewing. Decorum...


130 posted on 10/21/2011 7:08:59 AM PDT by momtothree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: momtothree

I’ve told my children that a fraternal greeting, as they say in church, is in order between unmarried persons. I’m very sensitive about people’s taking physical liberties.

In the context of a school, any kind of romantic displays are a distraction from what should be the purpose of the institution.


131 posted on 10/21/2011 7:14:39 AM PDT by Tax-chick (You could be a monthly donor, too. It's easy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: momtothree; Tax-chick

You aren’t being old fashioned at all.. I agree. A stolen kiss between a girl and a boy at a Homecoming Dance is cute to me. A full groping event is crass.

I agree, and with TV and all that jazz being so much about even cohabitation, people of either same or opposite gender associations showing little value, it makes me want to just get shows like “I Love Lucy” or other old fashioned sitcoms on video. Yes, it was way before my time, but the behavior of a married couple on I love Lucy is more modest than plenty of regular unmarried couples. Again, IMO, devaluing things that were once genuine, valued, tokens of affection, is part of the reason why people care less for aberrant sexual behaviors. The interesting correlation is that while people have been making their affection less value, even those practicing homosexuality have gone a similar route, even back during the 1950s, I don’t believe homosexuality, especially male homosexuality was too deviating from the general population in terms of health issues, both mental as well as physical.


132 posted on 10/21/2011 7:25:23 AM PDT by Morpheus2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: Morpheus2009; momtothree
I don’t believe homosexuality, especially male homosexuality was too deviating from the general population in terms of health issues, both mental as well as physical.

The correlation of homosexuality with drug use, relationship violence, suicide, and sexually-transmitted disease has consistently been pretty strong, at least in modern Western societies. Going back to classical times, things are a little different - for one thing, we don't know much about their experience of disease, beyond obvious catastrophic epidemics.

I have a theory that, given their instrumental view of women (they keep house and have babies), men in ancient societies diverted the emotional drama that now characterizes less-successful heterosexual relationships into homosexual interactions.

133 posted on 10/21/2011 7:49:06 AM PDT by Tax-chick (You could be a monthly donor, too. It's easy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

The correlation of homosexuality with drug use, relationship violence, suicide, and sexually-transmitted disease has consistently been pretty strong, at least in modern Western societies. Going back to classical times, things are a little different - for one thing, we don’t know much about their experience of disease, beyond obvious catastrophic epidemics.

A great deal of STDs weren’t too common before recent times, people associated most of them with fornication or adultery, not totally accurate, but it was their primary assumption during the day. During the late 1960s/early 1970s it started to show that issues like irritable bowel syndrome, shigellosis, gonorrhea, and syphillis were disproportionate. Political Correctness tried to soften up the facts but people still know what MSM means.


134 posted on 10/21/2011 6:25:06 PM PDT by Morpheus2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: momtothree

I had a male friend in college who I asked this question of, and he replied that the appeal was that the women were so aroused, perhaps he could get involved in the action. Sort of playing into the fantasy of two women wanting him at the same time. Then he laughed and said, “In theory anyway. I don’t really get turned on by that.”

Uh-huh.


135 posted on 10/25/2011 11:15:25 AM PDT by Conservaliberty (If Paul and Palin were running mates, would their foreign policies be like matter and anti-matter?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-135 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson