[OneVike]

Pro-lifers make a tactical error with the rape/incest exception.

So I guess you think people like me should have been aborted.

I am the product of a rape. Plus my mother was told after she had my older sister that if she got pregnant again it would kill her.

I thank God every day I am alive for my life, because if I was born after 1973 I would never have been born.

If a child should be murdered in the womb because their father committed a crime, then we should be putting to death all the children of those who have been convicted of crimes.

After all, when you abort a child that was created from the act of a rape or incest, you are in essance punishing the child for the crime of their faher.

[AuH2ORepublican]

“If a child should be murdered in the womb because their father committed a crime, then we should be putting to death all the children of those who have been convicted of crimes.

After all, when you abort a child that was created from the act of a rape or incest, you are in essence punishing the child for the crime of their father.”

---

Amen. Our Constitution prohibits “corruption of blood” (punishing the children of criminals) even in cases of treason, yet seemingly a majority of Americans condone the murder of unborn babies whose father was a rapist. I believe that it should be rapists, not their innocent children, who should receive the death penalty.

[hecht]

You really should reread my post. Basically I argued the point you just made.