>>”Out” myself?<<
Yep, because unless you do, or have kids to support you, you are depending on the kindness of others to keep your sorry butt alive.
>>So you’re criticizing me for not producing heirs which would produce revenue to be confiscated by the State and then distributed via socialized medicine and the Ponzi scheme of SS. <<
Nope, for taking from it. Or any tax that my kids pay for. Like the roads? My kids will be paying long after you’re not. Police? Fire? You are living your lifestyle on the backs of future generations.
Go get Mark Steyn’s America Alone and educate yourself.
Yep, because unless you do, or have kids to support you, you are depending on the kindness of others to keep your sorry butt alive.
Gee, and here I thought I was depending on my retirement savings and the accumulated wealth which I've been building up for the last 30 years.
Nope, for taking from it. Or any tax that my kids pay for. Like the roads? My kids will be paying long after you’re not. Police? Fire? You are living your lifestyle on the backs of future generations.
Not me. Unlike over half of Americans, I'm a net tax payer, not a net tax recipient. Unless I live to 100, there's no way I'll get more out of SS & Medicare what I put in. On the other hand, your kids have (on average) a better than 50% chance of being net tax recipients, thus a drain on the system.
The (obvious) solution is not to have such socialist programs as Medicare and SS in the first place, yes?
It’s really funny how the people that accuse the childless of being selfish always throw having kids to support you into their argument. THAT’S the selfish move, creating life for the sole purpose of having somebody to wipe your butt in your dotage is the most selfish thing imaginable. If there’s somebody selfish in this thread it’s you, not to mention insulting, and just plain shrill.