[Nervous Tick]

>> 2.) No Cain attacks are directed at Romney.

That right there is plenty suspicious.

[rconser]

What is even more suspicious is the fact that Cain endorsed Romney over Conservatives in 2008 and on 9/22/11, Cain said that Romney would be his choice for VP.

What kind of “conservative” endorses Mitt Romney? When other Republicans endorse Romney they are called rinos or worse. Why is Cain allowed to get a pass on his endorsement of Romney?

[Houghton M.]

“2.) No Cain attacks are directed at Romney.”

That’s just plain false.

And plenty suspicious of you to affirm it.

[Republican Wildcat]

>> 2.) No Cain attacks are directed at Romney. That right there is plenty suspicious.

Except for the fact it is not even close to being true.

[fightinJAG]

Why should Cain attack Romney aggressively at this point?

Cain is gaining on Romney in all the polls just doing what he’s doing.

Ever heard of “keeping your powder dry”?

Or that business strategy called “swimming with the sharks”?