“There was a long thread on FR yesterday about Cain’s remarks on the electrified fence. I’d say half the respondents supported zapping anyone trying to illegally cross the Tex-Mex border.”
...and I was one probably the biggest poster on that thread. And no, I didn’t want to see anyone killed, and doubt more than a handful of people would be killed by that kind of fence (the ones that test the system). Simply put, people are not going to test it as long as they believe it’s real.
Supporting the status-quo (i.e., no fence) means that those people are fine with Hispanics (and others) by the HUNDREDS dying every year in the Arizona desert and other remote places. If the wall is there, they don’t try, and they live.
Given the above, I’d say the status-quo people are MUCH MORE bloodthirsty than the pro-fence people.
Isn’t Mexico’s unemployment rate less than ours? If so, why would they even come here unless it’s for the freebies or they’re up to no good and figure they’ll be protected here?
Pal, you are an idiot.
Maybe you didn't "want" to see anyone killed, but you sure sounded pretty bloodthirsty yourself.
This is what you posted on the thread last night:
I agree, that would be ‘heartless’. Anyway, anyone dumb enough to expose their kid to that fence deserves to have them popped off.
I said it last night, and I'll say it again - that is a dispicable and vile thing to say - that whole thread really opened my eyes to what a large contingent of Cain supporters are really like. Bunch of flakes!
Dang.
Reagan Man hit you again by projecting onto you his main flaw.