Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lady Gaga serenades Bill Clinton
Politico ^

Posted on 10/16/2011 6:11:09 AM PDT by Sub-Driver

Lady Gaga serenades Bill Clinton October 16, 2011

Lady Gaga certainly wasn’t shy about singing for Bill Clinton on Saturday night. During a concert honoring the tenth anniversary of Clinton's foundation and his belated 65th birthday, the pop star playfully flirted with the former president.

“Bill, I’m having my first real Marilyn Monroe moment,” Gaga said after crooning “happy birthday” to him during her opening number. “I always wanted to have one. And I was hoping that it didn’t involve an accident with some pills and a strand of pearls, so here we are.”

Clinton — in the front row at the Hollywood Bowl with his wife, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, and daughter, Chelsea — laughed when Gaga told him, “I wish you were playing sax with me tonight, baby.”

Wearing only a beige body suit and heels by the end of the performance, Gaga took off pieces of her outfit as she danced and adapted a few of her hit songs for the occasion. “So tonight, I just thought we’d all get caught up in a little 'Bill Romance,'” she said before her rendition of “Bad Romance” devoted to the 42nd president. At one point, while gyrating directly in front of Clinton clan, Gaga quipped, “It’s a good thing I used to dance on bars, right?”

The former first family smiled and clapped along, but Clinton later told the crowd (and those who watched the concert live-streamed on Yahoo!) that he was a little worried about the performance. "I got nervous when Gaga said she was planning to have a Marilyn moment. I thought, my God, I get Lady Gaga and I will have a heart attack celebrating my 65th birthday,” he joked.

(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: ladygaggag; slimeballs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last
A new low..........
1 posted on 10/16/2011 6:11:14 AM PDT by Sub-Driver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

...not for Clinton it isn’t...

Sure Gaga is all over it - it’s giving her exposure to the lib’s...plus Hillary is fantasizing about the whole affair - while her moslem aid is standing int he background tearing apart a Barbie doll out of jealously...


2 posted on 10/16/2011 6:13:55 AM PDT by BCW (http://babylonscovertwar.com/index.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Nauseating. Especially on an empty stomach.


3 posted on 10/16/2011 6:13:57 AM PDT by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
If a CSI team didn't have to collect DNA evidence, it's not a low for Clinton.
4 posted on 10/16/2011 6:14:54 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (Compare "Delay is preferable to error" - Thomas Jefferson // "Pass this bill now!" - Barack Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Bubba Clinton. I wonder what Hillary thought of Gaga?


5 posted on 10/16/2011 6:15:22 AM PDT by csvset
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Slick Willie always had a penchant for bimbos.


6 posted on 10/16/2011 6:17:33 AM PDT by The Great RJ ("The problem with socialism is that pretty soon you run out of other people's money" M. Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Ah! I just now saw the pic of Gaga. What a skank! Perfect for Billy Jeff.


7 posted on 10/16/2011 6:17:33 AM PDT by csvset
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: csvset

Why such a big party? He was like Eisenhower-lucky and didn’t accomplish anything. At least Carter had Camp David.


8 posted on 10/16/2011 6:17:41 AM PDT by DIRTYSECRET
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Image and video hosting by TinyPic
9 posted on 10/16/2011 6:18:19 AM PDT by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Image and video hosting by TinyPic
Image and video hosting by TinyPic
10 posted on 10/16/2011 6:19:12 AM PDT by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Standing OHvation.

11 posted on 10/16/2011 6:19:17 AM PDT by They'reGone2000 (They'reGone2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

She does enjoy the occasional cigar...

12 posted on 10/16/2011 6:19:26 AM PDT by andy58-in-nh (America does not need to be organized: it needs to be liberated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Heard Ham Hocks is secretly ordering ga ga wardrobe to rekindle her romance with bubba. Talk about loosing your lunch


13 posted on 10/16/2011 6:20:17 AM PDT by ronnie raygun (V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
"'We like your president. We want to see him reelected', former Chinese intelligence chief General Ji Shengde told Chinagate bagman Johnny Chung. Indeed, Chinese intelligence organized a massive covert operation aimed at tilting the 1996 election Clinton’s way."

The Idiot's Guide to Chinagate
By Richard Poe
May 26, 2003

CHINA WILL LIKELY replace the USA as world leader, said Bill Clinton in a recent Washington Post interview. It is just a matter of time. Clinton should know. He has personally done more to build China’s military strength than any man on earth.

Most Americans have heard of the so-called "Chinagate " scandal. Few understand its deadly import, however. Web sites such as "Chinagate for Dummies" and its companion "More Chinagate for Dummies" offer some assistance. Unfortunately, with a combined total of nearly 8,000 words, these two sites – like so many others of the genre – offer more detail than most of us "dummies" can absorb.

For that reason, in the 600 words left in this column, I will try to craft my own "Idiot’s Guide to Chinagate," dedicated to all those busy folks like you and me whose attention span tends to peter out after about 750 words. Here goes.

When Bill Clinton took office in 1993, China presented little threat to the United States. Chinese missiles "couldn’t hit the side of a barn," notes Timothy W. Maier of Insight magazine. Few could reach North America and those that made it would likely miss their targets.

Thanks to Bill Clinton, China can now hit any city in the USA, using state-of-the-art, solid-fueled missiles with dead-accurate, computerized guidance systems and multiple warheads.

China probably has suitcase nukes as well. These enable China to strike by proxy – equipping nuclear-armed terrorists to do their dirty work, while the Chinese play innocent. Some intelligence sources claim that China maintains secret stockpiles of chemical, biological and nuclear weapons on U.S. soil, for just such contingencies.

In 1997, Clinton allowed China to take over the Panama Canal. The Chinese company Hutchison Whampoa leased the ports of Cristobal and Balboa, on the east and west openings of the canal respectively, thus controlling access both ways. A public outcry stopped Clinton in 1998 from leasing California’s Long Beach Naval Yard to the Chinese firm COSCO. Even so, China can now strike U.S. targets easily from their bases in Panama, Vancouver and the Bahamas.

How did China catch up so fast? Easy. We sold them all the technology they needed – or handed it over for free. Neither neglect nor carelessness are to blame. Bill Clinton did it on purpose.

As a globalist, Clinton promotes "multipolarity" – the doctrine that no country (such as the USA) should be allowed to gain decisive advantage over others.

To this end, Clinton appointed anti-nuclear activist Hazel O’Leary to head the Department of Energy. O’Leary set to work "leveling the playing field," as she put it, by giving away our nuclear secrets. She declassified 11 million pages of data on U.S. nuclear weapons and loosened up security at weapons labs.

Federal investigators [Cox Report] later concluded that China made off with the "crown jewels" of our nuclear weapons research under Clinton’s open-door policy – probably including design specifications for suitcase nukes. Meanwhile, Clinton and his corporate cronies raked in millions.

In his book The China Threat, Washington Times correspondent Bill Gertz describes how the system worked. Defense contractors eager to sell technology to China poured millions of dollars into Clinton’s campaign. In return, Clinton called off the dogs.

Janet Reno and other counterintelligence officials stood down while Lockheed Martin, Hughes Electronics, Loral Space & Communications and other U.S. companies helped China modernize its nuclear strike force.

"We like your president. We want to see him reelected," former Chinese intelligence chief General Ji Shengde told Chinagate bagman Johnny Chung. Indeed, Chinese intelligence organized a massive covert operation aimed at tilting the 1996 election Clinton’s way.

Clinton’s top campaign contributors for 1992 were Chinese agents; his top donors in 1996 were U.S. defense contractors selling missile technology to China.

Clinton recieved funding directly from known or suspected Chinese intelligence agents, among them James and Mochtar Riady who own the Indonesian Lippo Group; John Huang; Charlie Trie; Ted Sioeng; Maria Hsia; Wang Jun and others.

Commerce Secretary Ron Brown served as Clinton’s front man in many Chinagate deals. When investigators began probing Brown’s Lippo Group and Chinagate connections, Brown died suddenly in a suspicious April 1996 plane crash.

Needless to say, China does not share Clinton’s enthusiasm for globalism or multipolarity. The Chinese look out for Number One.

"War [with the United States] is inevitable; we cannot avoid it," said Chinese Defense Minister General Chi Haotian in 2000. "The issue is that the Chinese armed forces must control the initiative in this war." Bill Clinton has given them a good start.

The Idiot's Guide to Chinagate:
http://www.richardpoe.com/column.cgi?story=125

or,
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2003/5/26/214938.shtml
(this version hasn't the necessary hyperlinks, but the above doesn't seem to be available any longer)
_________________________________

Related Stories
Richard Poe, "Chinagate: The Third-Way Scandal" (June 3, 1999)
Christopher Ruddy, "Russia and China Prepare for War: Parts I - VIII," NewsMax.com (March 9 -18, 1999)
_____________________________________________________________

From the Sino-Russian Joint Statement of April 23, 1997:
"The two sides [China and Russia] shall, in the spirit of partnership, strive to promote the multipolarization of the world and the establishment of a new international order."
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Central_Asia/HI29Ag01.html
_____________________________________________________________

"As a globalist, [Bill] Clinton promotes "multipolarity" – the doctrine that no country (such as the USA) should be allowed to gain decisive advantage over others."

From a 2003 Washington Post article:

"...a statement [Bill] Clinton made in February 2002, in which he told an audience in Australia, 'This is a unique moment in U.S. history, a brief moment in history, when the U.S. has preeminent military, economic and political power. It won't last forever. This is just a period, a few decades this will last.'

Clinton continued...

'In all probability, we won't be the premier political and economic power we are now' in a few decades, he said, pointing to the growth of China's economy and the growing economic strength of the European Union.

Whether the United States maintains its military supremacy, he said, depends in part on how much those other entities invest in their militaries, and Clinton said working cooperatively is essential to U.S. interests.

But he said he did not want to be misunderstood. 'I never advocated that we not have the strongest military in the world...I don't think a single soul has thought I was advocating scaling back our military.'

Source: Washington Post article from May 2003:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&node=&contentId=A62253-2003Apr30&notFound=true

or find his remarks here (Talon News):
Clinton Predicts America's Decline:
http://mensnewsdaily.com/archive/newswire/nw03/talonnews/0503/newswire-tn-050503d.htm

14 posted on 10/16/2011 6:21:01 AM PDT by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

What can one expect really, you’re judged by the company you keep and these two deviants deserve each other.


15 posted on 10/16/2011 6:22:07 AM PDT by Tyrone13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

There was a time when being associated with such a whorish skank would have been enough to totally demolish one’s reputation. Today it’s just the opposite. Makes him all the more popular and relevant. Heaven help us.


16 posted on 10/16/2011 6:25:17 AM PDT by all the best
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

oh shame on me for clicking!!! Yuck.


17 posted on 10/16/2011 6:26:28 AM PDT by ronniesgal ( I miss George Bush. Hell, I miss Bill Clinton!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

I’ve seen some of her videos and the most striking thing is her complete lack of sex appeal.


18 posted on 10/16/2011 6:29:48 AM PDT by Hacklehead (The purpose of political correctness is to hide the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Where is the Barf Alert.

This story is a barfarama.


19 posted on 10/16/2011 6:30:16 AM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

The Gag is no lady.


20 posted on 10/16/2011 6:31:04 AM PDT by Scotsman will be Free (11C - Indirect fire, infantry - High angle hell - We will bring you, FIRE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson