Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Elderly patients condemned to early death by secret use of do not resuscitate orders
The Telegraph ^ | Oct. 16, 2011 | Laura Donnelly and Alastair Jamieson

Posted on 10/15/2011 8:08:55 PM PDT by Free ThinkerNY

Elderly patients are being condemned to an early death by hospitals making secret use of "do not resuscitate" orders, an investigation has found.

The orders – which record an advance decision that a patient's life should not be saved if their heart stops – are routinely being applied without the knowledge of the patient or their relatives.

On one ward, one-third of DNR orders were issued without consultation with the patient or their family, according to the NHS's own records. At another hospital, junior doctors freely admitted that the forms were filled out by medical teams without the involvement of patients or relatives.

Under medical guidelines, the orders should only be issued after senior staff have discussed the matter with the patient's family. A form, signed by two doctors, is then placed in the patient's notes to record what decision was taken.

The findings emerged in spot checks of 100 hospitals undertaken by the Care Quality Commission (CQC), an official watchdog, earlier this year.

A charity for the elderly said the disclosures were evidence of "euthanasia by the backdoor," with potentially-lethal notices being placed on the files of patients simply because they were old and frail.

(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cqc; deathpanels; dnr; donotresuscitate; euthanasia; moralabsolutes; prolife
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last
To: Free ThinkerNY
Pinged from Terri Dailies


21 posted on 10/16/2011 11:35:56 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll

Some otherwise entirely admirable ppl are totally discomfited
by the sight of routine life-support measures, not realizing
what “advance directives” really mean nowadays.
Each DNR directive should be based on an assessment of
the particular patient, and not based on age alone.
*ALSO* a DNR *should not* mean DNT “Do Not Treat” for
other remediable conditions.


22 posted on 10/17/2011 2:18:10 AM PDT by cycjec
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

It’s not only in Britain. I’ve read of unauthorized DNRs
several times, going back many years.


23 posted on 10/17/2011 2:19:22 AM PDT by cycjec
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins

There are appropriate circumstance for DNR and it sounds like you made the decision carefully and thoughtfully. Of course, the big (make that huge) difference from the article is that you are a relative making the decision and not a hospital, doctor ...or janitor.


24 posted on 10/17/2011 3:13:15 PM PDT by prairiebreeze (I guess I'll keep living until I die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson