Next question,sir—and I respect your opine. Was she serving on active duty knowing she had a sexual orientation as a homosexual? If so —then she ought to have been discharged as a LIAR. Because the Law—when we had a Moral and Religious Congress was that homosexuality was not compatible with Military service and the policy invented by that “unusually good LIAR Bill Clinton did not change the Law It only said Don’t ask— Don’t tell—and when I ,as a Vet wrote to the man I had in an act of stupidity helped put in Office the first time — The White House changed my Christian name to Seig Heil on the return envelope. But the MCM for 1994 edition suggested the LAW did not change under Clinton it appears to have been changed under Obama— but IMO nobody serving under the old Law ought claim benefits under the new —as they contracted under a Law they had no intent of honoring—i.e the served a LIE.
All I know is what is in the column. While it does not say directly one way or the other, I do not believe she was not lesbian when she enlisted. Just my opinion, but yes, I think she lied.