To: Clairity
And right here in Pennsylvania, and across the state line in West Virginia and Ohio, we will tap the full potential of the Marcellus Shale and create another 250, 000 jobs by getting the EPA out of the way. While Marcellus shale is today’s opportunity, the deeper Utica shale formations offer equally vast potential with more jobs over the horizon for Pennsylvania and its neighbors.
Someone should let the Governor know that we are doing this already. What exactly is his point here? Is he piggybacking on things that are already being done to pad his proposal?
25 posted on
10/14/2011 8:50:20 AM PDT by
Lazlo in PA
(Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
To: Lazlo in PA
“by getting the EPA out of the way. “
EPA is NOT out of the way.
45 posted on
10/14/2011 8:58:34 AM PDT by
Clairity
("The United States needs to be not so much loved as it needs to be respected." -- VP Dick Cheney)
To: Lazlo in PA
Someone should let the Governor know that we are doing this already. What exactly is his point here? Is he piggybacking on things that are already being done to pad his proposal? His point is that we will "tap the full potential of the Marcellus Shale," which is not being done today, by restraining the EPA's ability to interfere and we will then tap "the deeper Utica shale."
97 posted on
10/14/2011 9:37:38 AM PDT by
BuckeyeTexan
(Man is not free unless government is limited. ~Ronald Reagan)
To: Lazlo in PA
Since you are so knowledgeable of PA, can you please tell me why I read an article last week that they are closing refineries there?
110 posted on
10/14/2011 9:45:20 AM PDT by
World'sGoneInsane
(Just because you say it doesn't make it true. By repeating it, just makes it propaganda.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson